My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP43552
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP43552
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:45:47 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:56:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/2/1983
Doc Name
PERMIT AREA AS IT RELATES TO SUBSIDENCE
From
MLRD
To
BOB LIDDLE AND JIM PENDLETON
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiii~iii <br />999 <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />David H. Gelches, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SNELTO N, Director <br />Richard D. Lemm <br />Governor <br />T0: Bob Liddle and Jim Pendleton <br />FROM: Ed Bischoff / r~ <br />RE: Permit Area as it Relates to Subsidence <br />DATE: November 2, 1983 <br />After our meeting yesterday with Dorchester, I checked the regs <br />concerning the need to permit areas that may be affected by subsidence. <br />The definition of "permit area" (1.04 89) requires us to include "all <br />areas of land which are or will be affected by surface coal mining and <br />reclamation operations." Since the definition of surface coal mining <br />operations includes the surface effects of underground mines, it seems <br />clear that the regs require areas potentially affected by subsidence to <br />be in the permit area. This being the case, Dorchester permit area needs <br />to include areas within the angel of draw, until such time as Dorchester <br />can demonstrate that the surface will not be affected by subsidence. An <br />interesting note here is that the right of entry requirement is <br />contingent upon surface coal mining operations in the permit area. <br />The point Dorchester made yesterday is an interesting one, however. It <br />focused on the circumstance that if there are lands within the angle of <br />draw with no renewable resources or structures, then why should the <br />Division be concerned with protecting such lands (ie. having them within <br />a permit area). This issue raises some interesting questions. For <br />example, in the instance where no renewable resource lands or structures <br />exist, and subsidence occurs to the extent that it results in surface <br />disturbance, would we require the operator to repair that disturbance and <br />perhaps even bond for it? If so, how are we going to monitor if such <br />disturbance is occurring and if it results in some hazard or diminution <br />of the surface? If not, why include such areas in the permit area? We <br />should consider how to answer these questions in the future. <br />/th <br />Doc. No. 6727 <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.