My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP43535
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP43535
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:45:46 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:56:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/20/2007
Doc Name
2006 Annual Hydrology Report
From
Peak Project Management, LLC
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2006
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 2.0 MONITORING METHODS <br />2.1 SURFACE FACILITIES <br />During each monitoring event, in-situ water quality measurements of temperature, conductivity, <br />and pH were made. An expanded list of water quality analyses was conducted during the annual <br />sampling period from samples that were sent to a commercial laboratory. Prior to any field <br />samplings, the field meters were calibrated to known standazds. <br />Water quality or flow measurements were conducted by a number of methods. At the beginning <br />of the program, a straight, flat, stable reach of each stream was selected as a sampling location. <br />Near the down stream end of the reach, across-section was surveyed perpendiculaz to the stream <br />flow and permanently mazked with stakes and flagging. Flow was measured with aTeledyne- <br />Gurley Model 625 Pygmy type current meter (or similaz type meter) using the USGS six-tenths- <br />depih method. Lesser flows were monitored using a Parshall Flume with a two iach throat. <br />2.2 GROUND WATER SITES <br />Depth to water below top of the well casing was measured to the neazest tenth-foot using an <br />electric line water level detector. Water quality was sampled in the field directly from the wells <br />with a hand bailer. The wells were cleazed by bailing at least three columns of water (or bailing <br />• the well dry and allowing recharge) prior to collecting the sample. Equipment and procedures <br />used for water chemistry analysis were consistent with those described above for surface water. <br />3.0 HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES <br />Precipitation in the 2006 calendaz yeaz was neaz average with the above normal eazly winter <br />snow events in October and December and summer thunderstorms from late July to early <br />August. The first and second quarters were dry with only occasional light precipitation. <br />Hydrologic consequences of mining activities aze considered from two primary perspectives: <br />effects on water quantity and effects on water quality. These effects are addressed through flow <br />and water quality measurements of springs and seeps, streams and rivers, ponds and direct <br />discharges, and depths to water level and water quality of alluvial wells, and bedrock wells. <br />However, water quantity and quality are not independent functions of each other. Surface water <br />and groundwater quantities and water uses aze components of the hydrologic balance of the <br />region. Natural water quality varies as a function of flows, type (groundwater or surface water), <br />and location. Discharge of underground mine water and runoff or discharge from mine surface <br />activities modify natural water quality. Analysis of potential impacts associated with mining and <br />refuse disposal has been completed and aze contained in the mine permit document. This report <br />focuses on describing the water quality and quantity of the Purgatoire River, side canyons and <br />groundwater within the permit and adjacent azeas. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.