Laserfiche WebLink
MAR. -28' 971FR1) 15:19 WRIGHT WATER TEL:303 480 1020 P. 003 <br />Dave Berry and Mike Boulay <br />March 28, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br />Throughout the meeting, Dave Berry emphasized that the PHC information is extremely <br />important to Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG) and that such information is <br />"long overdue." Dave stressed that from CDMG's perspective, the PHC information is more <br />important than any other information or application that MCC is presently conducting. WWE <br />stated that MCC has repeatedly emphasized the importance of the PHC work, and that they <br />continue to monitor and analyze the situation, with their own staff and outside experts. <br />Discussion early in the meeting focused on the many steps that MCC took in 1996 to minimize <br />the adverse impacts of the major hydrologic changes that were occurring at the mine, including <br />fault inflows, utilization of underground sumps, etc. WWE briefly reviewed the list of such <br />factors in the Draft Technical Memorandum. Dave Betty indicated that, although he generally <br />concurred that MCC had taken many steps to properly manage the situation, CDMG staff have <br />long suspected that as the mine moved to the east (towards the Oliver No. 2 Mine) inflows <br />would increase. Dave indicated that MCC "seems to be moving towazd the source of the water" <br />and that it is the expectation of CDMG that high inflows will remain anever-present possibility. <br />Gary Witt provided reasons why, in the view of W WE (including John Rold and Rich Dunrud), <br />the lazge fault inflows encountered in 1996 could not have been foreseen. Gary Witt's response <br />included observations from Mr. Boyd Emmons (as per an interview with Rich Dunrud <br />conducted in October 1996). Mr. Emmons was a miner at the Oliver No. 2 Miae when it <br />abruptly shut down. <br />WWE asked Mike and Dave if they had any theories as to the source of the fault water. Dave <br />said that they have discussed this subject, and they think that the inflows are most likely <br />attributable to secondary porosity in the Rollins Formation, with a deeper source. Dave stressed, <br />however, that this theory is based on very limited information and that it is subject to change. <br />This discussion, in tum, caused WWE to cnmmari~e the work that Dr. Mayo of Mayo and <br />Associates in Utah (Dr. Mayo is also a professor at Brigham Young University) is now <br />conducting for MCC relative to defining the source of the fault inflows. WWE indicated that <br />Dr. Mayo's initial conclusion, based on the available data, is that the discharges from the faults <br />aze between 5,000 and 15,000 yeas old, thus indicating no recent connection to surface water. <br />We noted that Dr. Mayo and MCC will actually be drilling into the fault in the mine- Dave <br />Berry expressed strong approval of this work by Dr. Mayo and is pleased that MCC is taking <br />this initiative. <br />Update.• Dr. Mayo and MCC have now determined that the water is approximately 36,000 <br />years oldl Thrs information. based on additional isotope analyses, further supports the lack of a <br />direct connection to a local surface water source. <br />WWE asked Dave and Mike if they were awaze of other mines in the North Fork valley or <br />elsewhere in Colorado that had experienced large inflows and/or high temperature inflows. <br />Dave indicated that, to his recollection, the old Somerset Mine had encountered hot water- <br />probably hotter, in fact, than the current inflows to the West Elk Mine. Dave suggested that we <br />call Jim Pendleton for additional historical information. As for flow rate, Dave indicated that <br />