My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP43370
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP43370
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:45:32 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:52:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/29/1999
Doc Name
OBSERVATION OF PERIMETER DITCHES NEW ELK RDA WESTIN COLO JOB 28,170
From
CTL THOMPSON INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS
To
PICKET WIRE PROCESSING LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />June 29, 1999 <br />Picket Wire Processing, LLC <br />4643 S. Ulster St., Suite 1720 <br />Denver, CO 80237 <br />Attention: Mr. AI Perry <br />Subject: Observation of Perimeter Ditches <br />New Elk RDA <br />Westin, Colorado <br />Job No. 28,170 <br />Gentlemen: <br />As the request of Greystone, we observed the perimeter (side collection) <br />ditches on the east and west side of the New Elk RDA. Our observations were <br />performed on June 25, 1999. We understand construction of the riprap ditches was <br />completed prior to our February 1999 visit. We were provided with specifications for <br />the ditches including Perimeter Ditch Cross-Sections (Fig. 9) and Trapezoidal <br />Channel Specifications for RDA Perimeter Ditches (Table II). These figures are <br />attached and were incorporated into Exhibit 20 of the Permit Documents, Refuse <br />Pond Design and Certification. <br />Ditch construction was completed at the time of our observations. <br />Photographs of ditch conditions are presented on Figs. 1 through 5. Based upon <br />our observations, we have the following comments: <br />1. At many location along the edges of the ditch, the filter blanket was <br />evident. This is illustrated in the photo on Fig. 2. <br />2. Based upon our visual observation and evaluation of photographs, we <br />believe the riprap material meets the intent of the size <br />recommendations as outlined on Table 11. <br />3. In general, the riprap channels met the required width and depth <br />dimensions for sections related to the lower half of the RDA as shown <br />on Fig. 9. Two exceptions are discussed below. Although a precise <br />trapezoidal channel is difficult to construct using riprap, we believe the <br />ditches conform to the intent of the minimum dimensions shown on <br />Fig. 9. Although we could not positively confirm a minimum 4-foot <br />thickness of riprap is present, we saw no evidence it was not present. <br />CTL/THOMPSON, INC. <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />1971 WEST 12TH AVENUE ~ DENVER, COLORADO 80204 ~ (303) 825-0777 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.