Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />~ aad ~1 ~'R <br />INTERNAL MEMO <br />TO: Dan Mathews <br />FROM: Jim Burnell <br />SUBJ: AHR Review: Munger and McLane Canyon <br />1 August 2001 <br />I have reviewed the Annual Hydrology Report for each of these mines. Taking note of the <br />analyses that were not included, I still find that there is nothing of negative consequence to the <br />hydrologic balance in either report. The concentrations in Salt Creek, for example, show no <br />consistency upstream and downstream with regard to total dissolved solids (TDS), total <br />suspended solids (TSS) or other parameters. <br />Due to the scarcity of water at those two mines, the predictions in the probable hydrologic <br />consequences section of the permit for each of these (that there will be no impact to groundwater <br />or surface water) is demonstrated to date. <br />If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. <br />