My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP43222
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP43222
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:45:19 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:50:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/22/1993
Doc Name
TEX 1992 ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT 01/01/92 TO 12/31/92
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1992 ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT <br />1992 Disturbance Area <br />The 1992 Annual Reclamation Report, Exhibit 92.1, shows the limits of disturbance as of <br />January 1, 1993. This Line generally depicts areas of soil removal ahead of mining. <br />Actual disturbance ahead of mining for 1992 was 13.3 acres in the wo Lf Creek mining area <br />and 0.0 acres in the Yadge mining area. <br />Bec kfilling and Grading <br />The 1992 Annual Reclamation Report, Exhibit 92.1, shows the areas that were graded during <br />1992. There were 22.1 acres graded in the Nolf Creek mining area and 3.9 acres graded in <br />the wedge mining area. Existing Topography for the Wedge and Wolf Creek Nining areas is <br />shown on Exhibit 12-9, Post Mining Topography submitted to the Division on January 28, 1993 <br />as part of Technical Revision 27. <br />Soil and good Monitoring <br />Peabody is required by Permit C-80-005 to monitor the selvage, storage, and redistribution <br />• of soil and spoil handling operations et Seneca II Nine. Specific programs include <br />documenting soil recovery, verifying soil redistribution thickness, determining final <br />graded spoil quality, determining soil fertility, evaluating plant rooting characteristics, <br />recording the source of E'eplaced soil, and completing an annual soil balance. The <br />following sections present the soil end spoil monitoring date for the 1992 calendar year. <br />Soil Recovery Documentation. Soil recovery limits and depths were recorded on the soil map <br />by Peabody's soil scientist on April 15, July 13, September 18, October 6, and October 14 <br />to document the actual thickness of soil recovered during the 1992 field season. Color <br />ph otogrephs of the soil profile and landscape were taken to verify the thickness of soil <br />recovered. The field notes and photographs for each soil observation site ere on file at <br />Peabody's office in Flagstaff, Arizona. <br />This quality control information is used to verify soil salvage estimates predicted from <br />the baseline soil survey, confirm soil map unit types, justify selvage thickness, and <br />evaluate soil suitability. About 6.1 acres of mixed brush sandstone-derived soils, 5.7 <br />scree of reclaimed soils, end 1.5 acres of aspen swele colluviel soils were selvaged in <br />• advance of the 4olf Creek pit. Observations indicated very suitable loamy soil was <br />selvaged down to the fractured sandstone or regraded spoil. The thickness of recovered <br />soil ranged from 0.5 feet on ridgetops to abouC 4.0 feet in Swale locations. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.