REP42693 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Introduced species accounted for 20% of the seedmix used in 1990 (on a PLS seed weight basis) with the three dominant species mentioned above accounting for 10.6°,'° of [he mix. Based in part on previous monitoring results similar to those described above, the primary rangeland seedmix (# I) was adjusted in 1993 in order to reduce [he excessive competition provided by the aggressive introduced species. Intermediate wheatgrass was dropped from the mix, and the amount of titer milkvetch vas cut in half. The currently approved Seedmix # I, apparently used since 1994, contains 10.7% introduced species on a PLS seed weight basis (13.2% on a PLS seeds/square foot basis). Currently approved introduced species are Russian wildrye, orchardgrass, titer milkvetch, and Travois alfalfa. The much less Frequently used Seedmix #2, for mcsic sites, includes three introduced species, which comprise 30% of the mix on a PLS/sq. toot basis. Initial composition and succession on reclaimed areas seeded with the amtnded seedmix will continue to be monitored. Monitoring results to be submitted over the next couple of years should be evaluated by the operator and DMG, to assess whether complete elimination of introduced species from the permanent Seneca ll seedmixes may be warranted. Similar assessment should be undertaken for seedmixes used at Seneca II-W and Yoas[. Seedmix #1 a[ Seneca II-W contains two indroduced species (orchardgrass and Travois alfalfa) which comprise 5.3% of the mix on a PLS seeds/square foot basis. Mix #2 contains 30% introduced species, and Mix #3 (alkaline lowlands) contains 33°io introduced species. Yoast Mix # I contains two introduced species, Travois alfalfa and orchardgrass, which comprise 5.3% of the mix on a PLS seedslsquare foot basis. Mix #2 contains alt native species. and Mix #3 contains 11.7% invoduced species. Missing Information The information included N [he report was very thorough and well presented, with the basic data tables and narrative evaluation enhanced by graphs and photos. However, i[ would appear [ha[ certain monitoring information and documentation required by [he permit (as indicated in the current fmdings document) was not included in the report. Specific apparent deficiencies include the fallowing: I. Page 40 of the fmdings, paragraph 3, references an annual "planning map" showing the approximate location of shrub and tree planting to be done in the coming year. This "planning map" was not included in the reports I reviewed. Was this map submitted for 1998 and 1999 reclamation areas? Was any reclamation done in 1998 and will any be done in 1999? 2. Page 40 of the findings, paragraph 4, states that "quantitative measurements will be carried out in years 2, 4, and 7 following initial seeding. The data and results from this monitoring program will be submitted to the Division by the March 30 filing of the Annual Reclamation Report." To comply with this requirement, data and results from 1997 sampling of 1995 and 1993 reclaimed areas should have been included in the 1997 monitoring report, in addition to the data and results reported for the 1990 reclaimed area. The information should be submitted, if it was collected. If the areas were not sampled in 1997, an explanation should be provided. On page 41 of the findings, paragraph 4, i[ is stated that monitoring for the purpose of evaluating effects grazing on the Wadge study area is conducted annually, and that monitoring reports are to be submitted annually to the Division. The only Wadge pasture data included in the report was the shrub density data referenced previously in this memo. If the grazing study monitoring was conducted in 1997, the report needs to be submitted. If such monitoring was not conducted, an explanation will need to be provided. 4. One additional item of note regarding seedmixes. The approved permit contains two permanent seedmixes, in addition [o a shrub-only mix. which is used in concentrated shrub seeding areas. Seedmix I is the primary mix, designed for upland sites and ephemeral drainages.