Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiniiiiii <br />999 <br />Doc Date:1211112001 <br />• FISH CREEK ALLUVIAL VALLEY FLOOR STUDY AREA <br />2ND HALF 1993 <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />As part of the approval to undermine and subside a segment of Fish <br />Creek and its associated alluvial valley floor Twentymile Coal <br />Company established and extensive hydrologic monitoring network. <br />Additionally, Twentymile prepared channel profiles of Fish Creek <br />which began upstream of the mined area and extended through and <br />downstream of the mined area. Also, Twentymile conducted <br />vegetation surveys pre and post mining in areas both within and <br />outside of the mining areas. Finally, the information presented in <br />the first section of this report presented the subsided data <br />collected from the various subsidence monuments located within the <br />Fish Creek study area. <br />2.0 STATION ELEVATION SURVEYS <br />Tables 1 through 41 provide the hydrologic monitoring station <br />elevation data collected during the period of July 22, 1993 through <br />December 31, 1993. The July 22, 1993 data is used as the baseline <br />elevation for the various sites, except as noted on table 2. This <br />date was chosen due to the fact that mining activities have not <br />• previously impacted any of the stations established along Fish <br />Creek and in its valley floor, and that mining of panel 6 would <br />begin in September, 1993. The approved mining plan indicates that <br />panel 6 would have the greatest potential of subsiding Fish Creek <br />and its valley floor. <br />The survey data gathered during this time period showed that the <br />following sites were subsided: GWA6, GWAP7 and GWB2. All of these <br />wells showed that they have begun subsiding when they were surveyed <br />on October 18, 1993. The extent of subsidence varied from 1 to 2.4 <br />feet. The remainder of the stations did not experience any <br />significant subsidence. Station GWAPS appears to warrant further <br />review as the data indicates the well's measuring point is rising <br />as opposed to subsiding. This may well be a survey error. <br />3.0 HYDROLOGIC DATA <br />The field parameters for the various hydrologic monitoring stations <br />are presented on tables 42 through 55. In general the majority of <br />the stations have not been impacted by the mining operation. Of <br />the various sites only three have been subsided by Twentymile's <br />mining operation, those being: GWA6, GWAP7, and GWB2. Well GWB2 <br />was replaced subsequently by well GWB2R. <br />Well GWA6 started showing subsiding during October, with 1.0 feet <br />• of subsidence being reported for this well on October 18, 1993. By <br />the end of the year the well had subsided a total of 1.3 feet. The <br />