Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> <br />Well 83-02. However, as no beneficial use is derived from this <br />aquifer, the impact of the water level declines should be minimal. <br />Twenty Mile Sandstone - Other than a slight increase in water <br />levels, there is no apparent change in this aquifer. This <br />observation is consistent with the PHC predictions.. <br />Williams Fork Alluvium - The water level fluctuations observed in <br />the Williams Fork Alluvium appear to be seasonal. This is <br />consistent with the predictions of the PHC which stated that the <br />discharge from the alluvium to the mines is roughly balanced by the <br />discharge of mine water to the rivers. <br />GrounBwater Quality <br />Trout Creek Sandstone - I agree with the conclusion of the AHR that <br />no adverse impacts from mining are evident in tlhe Trout Creek <br />Sandstone. <br />Middle Sandstone - I agree with the conclusion of the AHR that no <br />adverse impacts from mining are evident in the Middle Sandstone. <br />Twenty Mile Sandstone - The AHR states that no adverse impacts from <br />mining are evident in the Twenty Mile Sandstone. However, the <br />dissolve manganese concentration of 210 ug/L in W<ell 259 exceeds <br />the Federal Secondary MCL of 50 ug/L by 320$. The elevated <br />manganese concentration may be the continuance of a trend, as the <br />1990 mean concentration was also high (290 ug/L or 480 higher than <br />the Secondary MCL). Although Secondary MCLs are primarily <br />aesthetic guidelines, the Twenty Mile Sandstone is a drinking water <br />aquifer, and this apparent trend should be watched. <br />Williams Fork Alluvium - The AHR describes an upward trend of <br />dissolved solids in Well AVF-3. However, Total Dissolved Solids <br />(TDS) in both wells AVF-3 and AVF-6 have decreased since 1988 when <br />the elevated TDS levels were first noted. In spite of the <br />declining trend, TDS levels in the Williams Fork .Alluvium remain <br />high and should be watched. <br />MINE DISCNARGES <br />Quantity <br />Flow data for the No. 5 Mine discharge points have not been <br />provided. The text summary of the AHR states tYiat the average <br />discharge for the No. 5 Mine Sump and 7 Angle Nori;.h is less than <br />that predicted by the PHC. Low discharge from 7 Angle North during <br />the first quarter and end of 1991 were due to a pump malfunction. <br />Quality <br />Elevated levels of dissolved solids in mine discharge waters appear <br />to be levelling off. Increased elevations of dissolved solids in <br />7 Angle North are reported to result from accumulation during the <br />