Laserfiche WebLink
<br />E <br />W <br />u <br />z <br />f <br />w <br />!wane !al Q Ce•,w Dm••I Q R: lioo-Uao y // ~~ <br />LCOFRD bbnN !bb fwt••IM <br />® Ftl•nq 7•••I,•la ®GYN•Inw. ,• pe0 -I ]20 4/n. <br />f0 <br />SNALE-TO- SNALE-TO- SO cm 60 cm 90 cm CAPILLARY <br />SURFACE SURFACE aMR1ER <br />UNLEACNED LEACNED <br />flg. 1. Pronle mnngulltlon! of the ]cloned FhAle dLsposAl 1KAImenUl. <br />Mno_ d a~r~;ti;,depth'.~lectnca~condncnvttles.el$oaQ- <br />,.~{,~,t5 jq,~e.S,tQ; J,pcm immediatetyabove`the~ha(erin, <br />dic~ting~t thi; fisthedepthlatwhich.solublesalts-begia~ <br />to,,aocttmulate4 Other processes such az capillary rise and <br />diffusion may also be occurring at the soil-shale inter- <br />faces to produce the disvibutions shown here. <br />Of the vace elements. considered in this study, F <br />presents perhaps the greatest hazard [o groundwater con- <br />tamination because of its high mobility. Runnells et al. <br />(1979) found that F concenvations in Paraho retorted <br />shale leachates contained two to five times the USEPA <br />standards for drinking water. Figure 3 shows that there <br />has been considerable movement and redistribution of <br />F within the seven soil-retorted shale profiles. This move- <br />ment is most obvious in the 30-cm topsoil treatment. <br />Fluorine has accumulated at both upper and lower soil- <br />shaleinterfaces and has decreazed in the middle portion <br />of the shale layer. The same effect is noticeable in the <br />60-cm topsoil treatment although it is no[ nearly az well <br />developed. This redistribution pattern can be explained <br />in terms oC the two processes mentioned earlier, leaching <br />and capillary rise. When precipitation exceeds <br />evapotranspiration, the net downward movement of <br />walcr through the shale undoubtedly leaches F (and other <br />soluble constituents) deeper in the profile, resulting in a <br />greater concentration of F at the lower shale-soil inter- <br />face. When evapotranspiration increases, evaporation <br />and plant roots (which were observed to extend 18-22 crrt <br />into the shale) remove moisture from the topsoil and up- <br />per shale layers. This may result in movement of water <br />from the moist middle shale layers to the dry upper layers <br />by capillary action, depositing additional F near the up- <br />per soil-shale interface. The difference in distribution bet- <br />ween Fand SAR could simply be a result oC differences <br />in solubilities between the fluorine and Na compounds <br />present. <br />Molybdenum showed only slight redistribution within <br />the profiles (Fig. 3). Although Mo concentrations in the <br />8 to 28 cm of soil immediately adjacent to the shale in- <br />creased approximately 0.6 µg/g, the majority of the Mo <br />CONTROL <br />remained within the shale layer itself. The limited mobility <br />of Mo shown here is surprising considering the observa- <br />tions made by Runnells et al. (1979). In laboratory <br />studies, these researchers found concentrations of 2 to <br />5 g/mL in leachates from Paraho retorted shale, sug- <br />gestingthat Mo would be much more mobile under field <br />conditions than it actually is. ]t is also interesting to note <br />that the leached shale treatment had no greater movement <br />oC Mo than any other veatments. Apparently leaching <br />haz G[tle effect on reducing Mo concentrations under field <br />conditions. <br />Boron has been reported to be present in high concen- <br />trations in retorted shale and thus represents a potential <br />hazard to plant growth (Schmehl, 1971; Kilkelly and <br />Lindsay, 1979) and groundwater contamination (Runnells <br />et al., 1979) because of its high mobility. All of the B <br />concentrations found in the soil-shale profiles in this <br />study, however, were relatively low (Fig. 4). In Cact, the <br />highest concentration of B was in the disturbed control <br />treatment (2.2 µg/nrL). The exposed shale treatments did <br />have slightly higher B concentrations than the control in <br />the upper 60 cm, but the concentrations are low enough <br />that they probably do not represent much of a hazard <br />to plant growth. <br />Arsenic was one of the least mobile of the dace <br />elements studied. In spite of the observation made by <br />KJein et al. (1981) and Hazsler et al. (1984) that volatiliza- <br />tion of As and subsequent movement of gaseous As <br />represents a potential pathway for movement within [he <br />profile, and the findings oC Runnells et al. (1979) that <br />small amounts of As occur in leachates from Paraho <br />retorted shale, there haz been no observable movement <br />of As out of the shale layer and into the adjacent soil <br />after 6 yr in the Feld. <br />A number of other trace elements showed distribution <br />patterns similar to As. Cadmium, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, <br />Se, and Zn also showed no movement out of the shale <br />layer into the soil. Table 1 lists the average concentra- <br />tions of these elements in the topsoil and retorted shale <br />material. <br />J. EDClron. Qoal., VoI. 15, no. S, 19g6 2g3 <br />