My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP41920
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP41920
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:43:44 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:09:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/31/1994
Doc Name
1993 REVIEW 1ST SEMI ANNUAL SUBSIDENCE REPORT
From
TWENTYMILE COAL CO
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REVIEW OF THE 1993 FIRST SEMI-ANNUAL SUBSIDENCE REPORT <br />CYPRUS TWENTYMILE COAL COMPANY <br />FOIDEL CREEK MINE <br />The scope of work covered by this report involves reviewing subsidence data from the <br />first, 1993 semi-annual report, determining the validity of reported draw angles, and <br />commenting on any variance that exists between predicted and measured subsidence. <br />Review Results: The results of the review are contained in the attached tables and <br />corresponding figures. Please note that I have added the original predicted subsidence <br />(from tables 10 and 11 of the Permit Report) to both the tables and subsidence profiles <br />for Monitoring Lines 3000 and 4000 to illustrate the close relationship between predicted <br />and actual subsidence. <br />Data from monitoring line 3000 shows a maximum subsidence of 3.6 feet and a draw <br />angle on-the order of 14° (limit at point 3017). <br />Data from monitoring line 4000 shows a maximum subsidence of 3.6 feet and a draw <br />angle on the order of 16° (limit at point 4024). <br />Conclusions: As shown in the attached figures and tables, measured subsidence data <br />reported in the first semi-annual subsidence report is within a few percent of predicted <br />values. On inspection, the larger than predicted draw angle, reported in your September <br />13, 1993 report to the Colorado DMG, is in error when you consider the stated accuracy <br />of the survey work (0.1 ft). The revised draw angle is on the order of 16°, assuming point <br />4024 to be the subsidence limit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.