Laserfiche WebLink
iii iuiiuiiiiuiii <br />999 <br />~` RECEIVED <br />_`= SUBSIDENCE MONITORING REPORT <br />January -June 1993 JAN 21 1994 <br />Cyprus Empire Eagle Mine No. 5, E-Seam Workings <br />L'iri~~cn ct avnarais a Ueclogy <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />This report summarizes the survey schedule for and results of the subsidence monitoring <br />of longwall mining panels in the E-seam at the Cyprus Empire Corporation (CEC) Eagle <br />Mine No. 5 for the period from January through June 1993. No mining occurred at the <br />mine during this period due to market conditions. <br />Monitoring point locations are shown on the map titled, "E-seam Longwall Subsidence <br />Monitors". This map sheet also shows mine workings, surface topography and <br />overburden thickness. <br />2.0 MONITORING SCHEDULE <br />Subsidence monitoring was pertormed in February and May 1993. These surveys <br />included all of monitoring lines "A", "B", "C", and "D", "J", "S", and "T". Weather <br />conditions and snow prevented complete monitoring of all points during the first quarter. <br />3.0 MINING ADVANCE <br />No mining occurred at the mine during this report period due to market conditions. <br />Mining of longwall panel 2 East was completed in December 1992. Mining of the 3 East <br />longwall panel is projected to start in August 1993. <br />4.0 SUBSIDENCE RESULTS <br />The results of the monitoring surveys are presented on the attached tables and profiles <br />for each of the monitoring lines. The accuracy specification on the monitoring survey is <br />0.1 ft. Therefore subsidence values of 0.1 ft or less are not considered significant. <br />Subsidence during this period was limited. Monitoring lines "A", "B", "C", and "D" <br />experienced no additional subsidence. This is consistent with the low overburden cover <br />at the locations of these monitoring lines. Monitoring lines "S", and "T" appear to have <br />experienced limited subsidence. This is most probably due to continuing, longer-term <br />subsidence resulting from overburden consolidation. This is consistent with the 900-ft- <br />plus overburden thicknesses that occur at the locations of these monitoring lines. <br />