My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP41890
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP41890
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:43:42 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:08:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/22/1999
Doc Name
OLD WASTE PILE OSMRE SPECIAL OVERSIGHT INSPECTION RESOLUTION OF EXISTING SITUATION BOWIE 1 MINE PN
From
JIM PENDLETON
To
JOE DUDASH
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~. <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />DepanmeN of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 81., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 1303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (3031 832-8106 <br />DATE: March 22, 1999 <br />TO: Joe Dudash <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walther <br />Executive Director <br />/ ~ Michael 8. Long <br />_- Division Dneclor <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />RE: Old Wash-P+Ie~O~MRE Special Oversight Inspection <br />Resolution of Existing Situation, Bowie No. 1 Mine <br />(Permit No: C-81-038) <br />I previously reviewed the information regarding the Bowie No. 1 "old" waste pile. which <br />you forwarded to my attention. As I understand the situation, a question regarding <br />certification of the as-built pile arose during a joint special oversight inspection with OSM. <br />Further, the consulting engineers to Bowie Resources, Inc., who now owns and operates <br />the mine, declined to certify the pile as having been constructed in accordance with the <br />approved plan. The out slope is apparently over-steepened, which has suggested tnat it <br />was not constructed in accordance with the approved design. <br />Having a recollection of the original permanent program permitting of the Orchard Valle <br />Mine, now the Bowie No. 1 Mine, I am not surprised that such an situation might have <br />occurred. In relation to the significant permitting adequacy problems regarding topics <br />such as overall stability of the surface facilities, sediment control, and subsidence control, <br />the old waste pile was a minor concern at the time. As your documentation describes, <br />allowances were made to allow the operator to complete the pile and begin use of the <br />new pile. The old pile had a spontaneous combustion problem following its first remedial <br />treatment and had to be extinguished. It is possible that additional material was placed at <br />that time to cap the pile and prevent ignition. My recollection is vague concerning this <br />distant past. Realistically, I'm pessimistic that records research would enlighten us <br />concerning the topic of the exact total volume of the pile. Relatively speaking, however, <br />the pile is small. In my opinion an extensive investigation to establish whether the <br />volume is small (±10%) would be an inappropriate expenditure of time and effort. <br />iii iiiiiiiiiiiuiii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />In accordance with our regulations and the approved permit the old waste pile should <br />have been certified. It was not. To his credit, the consultant is not willing to certify a <br />pile he does not believe meets the design requirements. Certification of the pile by any <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.