My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP41820
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP41820
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:43:38 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:08:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985203
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/22/2002
Doc Name
Blasting Plans
From
LJ Development Inc.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECOMMENDED FRACTICE5 AND CONTROLS <br />For BLASTING OPERATIONS at <br />SUMMIT BRICKAND TILE CO.'S <br />CLAY MINES <br />CONCLUSIONS and SUMMARY <br />The following general summary of findings, which considers the impacts of the proposed <br />blasting and excavating work of Summit Brick and Tile Go. (Summit Brick) are reviewed <br />by Albuquerque Geological (AG). Conclusions and specific recommendations for <br />controlling specific aspects of the blasting and excavating work are included in sections of <br />this report addressing each individua! mine owned and operated by Summit Brick. <br />1. After a careful review all of the potential impacts that blasting might have at the 1.J <br />Fox, 2.J Stocks, 3.) 8-Mile Clay, 4.) Beaver Creek, 5.) Patton, 6.) Cedasze~ood, <br />and 7.) Edmondson mines on the local population; their dwellings, animals, structums <br />or buildings, water wells, and the environment in general, A G has found no uture or e~ct <br />that would prevent the proposed blasting and mining fmm being safely performed. In <br />order to make this determination, A G has used published blasting and enginccring data, <br />as well as our experience directly involved in many projects where rock blasting was <br />performed without incident. >;ach mine was visited to determine site specific conditions <br />and requirements. <br />2. AG has found no evidence suggesting that blasting and rock excavation will have <br />any significant long-term impacts on the land that will be mined within Summit Brick's <br />various permitted mining areas. Noise and vibration from blasting would exist only <br />temporarily during each event and they are no[ expected to cause any tasting damage. <br />The effect or impact on groundwater would be negligible, as the blasting is faking place at <br />the surface and the depth of groundwater in all cases is significantly below this level. <br />A site-specific plan has been made for each individual mine site and is shown above. There <br />maybe be slight variations to the information included within this report, however, in all <br />circttmstances, all conditions stated here-in aze to be considered a maximum conditions or <br />amounts ofpowder used. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.