My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP41800
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP41800
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:43:37 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 9:07:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980002
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/2/1980
Doc Name
PROPOSE AND SCOPE
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e~~~. GROUND WATER HYDROLOGY <br />The site as mentioned earlier is high up on a mountain at approx- <br />imately 9,200 feet in elevation. The geology consists of Cretaceous <br />sediments of the Mesa Verde formation. The coal is mined from Bed No. 2 <br />(Bed C).~ Directly overlying .the coal is a sandstone and siltstone unit <br />of the Mesa. Verde that varies in thickness from 8 [0 12 feet. The <br />regional dip is 3 degrees Northwest; however, there are local variations <br />within the mine.' An on-site inspection of the underground workings of <br />the mine revealed very little seepage from the mine itself. No seepage <br />was found from the sandstone over the mine. Some minor seepage was <br />found in the walls in the coal. It is believed that what seepage and <br />water that is in the mine is the product of water moving through frac- <br />tures in the coal and not through the sandstones. It is also signifi- <br />cant to note that the out-crop of the sandstone and the coal is in the <br />immediate area of the mine only a few hundred feet below the top of the <br />mountain. Therefore, there is very little recharge area for any of <br />these units in the vicinity.' For these reasons, it is believed that <br /> <br />neither [he sandstone overlying the mine nor the coal could be considered <br />viable aquifers. The discharge was measured at one point in the mine at <br />one and one-half gallons per minute. It is our opinion that this flow <br />is insignifi,=ant and will not effect any wells or other rights of the <br />area. 'It is also significant to note that the water flows down-dip in <br />the mine and eventually goes through a concrete block seal and into the <br />Nu mine where it subsequently flows down-dip and discharges on tl~e north- <br />west side of the mountain. This water has been appropriated and put to <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.