Laserfiche WebLink
The report is in compliance with this rule. 7.2 acres were reported as disturbed during 2004. <br />Rule 2.04.13(])(c) Location and number of acres bac~lled and graded during that year; <br />The report is in compliance with this rule. None were backfilled and graded. <br />Rule 2.04.13(1)(d) Location and number acres topsoiled during that year; <br />The report is in compliance with this rule. None were topsoiled. <br />Rule 2.04.13(1)(e) The species, location and number of acres of vegetation planted during that year, <br />including any augmented seeding or cultural practices; and <br />The report is in compliance with this rule. None were vegetated. The report includes a description of weed <br />control (spraying) accomplished. <br />Rule 2.04.13(1)(f) Location, number of acres and date of planting for all previously revegetated areas. <br />The report may be incomplete with regard to this rule. A number of acres are reported as reclaimed. The <br />operator is asked to explain. <br />Rule 2.04.13(2) The permittee may provide additional monitoring information as required by the <br />approved permit. <br />The operator submitted the Division reclamation report as part of the ARR. Cumulative total acres <br />backfilled and graded, topsoiled, and seeded are reported as none, but a number of disturbed areas have <br />been reported as reclaimed. The operator is asked to explain. In addition, the operator misunderstood the <br />requests of the Division form regarding cumulative totals to date for the life of mine. These were edited at <br />the Division in telephone and on-site coordination with operator people. <br />Image file location <br />Permit: C1982056 (Foidel Creek Mine) <br />Doc. Type: Reports <br />Doc. Name: 2004 ARR Review Checklist <br />2004 ARR Review, C-1982-056, page 2 of 2 pages <br />