Laserfiche WebLink
DEC 23 '96 09~52RM DIViMIMERALS&GEOLOGY P.3i3 <br />12. In the second paragraph on Page 15-10, the fourW sentence reads tin the stunner of <br />198t;, 13 new monitor wells (GW-N13 thmugh GW-N22) wen completed is the <br />Nucla East mining azea.. '. Ntunerically, 13 to Z2 woWd indicate a total of 10 wells, <br />not thirteen. Please er~plain the discrepancy, or correct if this is in error. <br />13. In the second paragraph on Page IS-10, a sentence neaz the end of the paragraph <br />reads "Monitor well GW-N4R was installed as a replacement monitor weU for GW- <br />N4". However, in the 1995 AHR, WFC provided groundwater level data for both <br />wells, and provided water quality data from well GW-N4, but not from GW-N4R. <br />Please explain the discrepanry and then correct the deficienry. <br />14. There are currently two different maps that show water monitoring locadons for <br />Miae 1 (Fahibit 7-1) and Mine Z (Map 2.07-1-A), however, mnnerotts discrepancies <br />exist between the two maps. Although having two separate maps showing the <br />locations of each mines respective monitoring stations is feasible, it is preferable to <br />have one map showing all the statioa5 with a legend stating which stations have been <br />deleted, and which are currently used for Mine 1 and Mine 2. <br />If you have questions or need additional information, please Contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~~ ~ <br />Harry B. Ranney <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />