My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP41298
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP41298
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:43:10 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:59:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/24/1996
Doc Name
1995 ANNUAL HYDROLOGIC REPORT RED CANYON MINE PN C-81-034
From
DMG
To
MINREC INC
Annual Report Year
1995
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iuiuiiniii iii <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmenl of Natural Resources ' <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorario 80203 <br />Phone: 13 071 866-3 56 7 <br />FA%: (7031 832-8106 <br />January 24, 1996 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Mr. Jim Stover <br />MINREC, INC. <br />2768 Compass Drive, Suite 101 <br />Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 <br />Re: 1995 Annual Hydrologic Report <br />Red Canyon Mine (Permit No. C-81-034) <br />Dear Mr. Stover: <br />II~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5 lxhhead <br />E.ecmise Duector <br />Michael B. Long <br />Drvisian Director <br />The referenced annual hydrology report (AHR) was reviewed by <br />Barbara Pavlik of the Denver office, and a copy of her review <br />comments is enclosed. Ms. Pavlik's memo contains the following <br />questions and recommendations to which you will need to respond: <br />Item 2) Is there any indication that a spoil aquifer has <br />developed in the reclaimed waste disposal area? Have any springs <br />or seeps ever been observed at the waste disposal area, and if so <br />what were the flow and quality characteristics? <br />Item 7) In future AHR's, the table presented on page 2 should <br />include units for TDS. <br />Items 8) and 9) Was the intent <br />the E seam aquifer or the mine <br />relationship between the water <br />level in the mine workings? <br />of Well E-1 to monitor levels in <br />workings? What is the assumed <br />level in Well E-1 and the water <br />Item 10) With respect to wells which are not currently being <br />monitored, The D seam wells could be abandoned, as could wells E-2 <br />and E-3. We would not recommend abandonment of Well F-1, or <br />alluvial wells at this time, to allow for future monitoring if <br />questions were to arise prior to final bond release. It would be <br />prudent to delay sealing of these wells until shortly prior to <br />submittal of the final bond release request. <br />I would recommend that you contact Barbara Pavlik if you have <br />questions regarding specific concerns identified in her memo. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.