My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991-06-17_REPORT - M1977286
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1977286
>
1991-06-17_REPORT - M1977286
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2025 10:18:57 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:50:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977286
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/17/1991
Doc Name
DESIGN REPORT JOHNSON & SCHOOL SECTION PITS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`i <br /> USER Svt�11 1�aw►5 1 <br /> 15 Estimating Rainfall Runoff from Soil and Cover Data 543 <br /> Cen�crsioh 14MCZ� +o �tMC'� <br /> AMC-II.-The average case for annual floods, may be converted to a different antecedent <br /> ' that is, an average of the conditions which have moisture condition by the use of table A-7. <br /> preceded the occurrence of the maximum an- For example, the computations in table A-6 <br /> nual flood on numerous watersheds. give an AMC-II number of '73. The corre- <br /> AMC-III.-When heavy rainfall or light rain- sponding curve number for APQC-I and AMC- <br /> fall and low temperatures have occurred during III can be obtained from columns 2 and 3 of <br /> the 5 days previous to the given storm, and the table A-7. The curve numbers for AMC-I <br /> soil is nearly saturated. and AMC-III are 54 and 87, respectively. <br /> The numbers on tables A-2, A-3, A-4 and (b) Thunderstorm Rainfall.-Estimates of <br /> A-5 and figures A-2 and A-3 are for the aver- direct runoff from thunderstorm rainfall are <br /> age watershed condition, AMC-II. Curve more difficult than for general storm rainfall <br /> numbers for one antecedent moisture condition because data for thunderstorm-caused floods <br /> ' are meager. Type and density of vegetative <br /> cover on a watershed, as well as the time- <br /> TABLE A-7.-Curve numbers (CN) and constants sequence of rainfall, appear to have more in- <br /> [For the ease 1,=0.2S] fluence on thunderstorm runoff' than do ante- <br /> cedent moisture condition and soil group. <br /> (n (2) (3) (4) (5) l (u (2) (3) I a) (5) A definite time-sequence of 15-minute in- <br /> ' CS C.v for C.".. CN C. for Currr, cremental rainfall has been assigned for each <br /> for eonditi oe S etaro for rcm.m. S .taro designated geographical zone for thunderstorm <br /> rnndi- relunu rvhe,,..ndi- ,valnnl whets <br /> t.on nehea r- nort Inehee r- precipitation values given in this text. A sim- <br /> 11 1 II[ inches 11 1 111 inrhee <br /> --- -� --- plified "Thunderstorm Cover Index" relating <br /> 110 1181 1W) U. 0. W) 41) 78 6.67 1..33 to vegetative cover type and ground cover <br /> 99 07 100 .101 .02 SU 39 77 6.9.i 1.39 0 <br /> 98 '94 99 :'f14 .04 58 38 7G 72 1.45 density for watersheds west of the 105 merid- <br /> 97 91 99 .3119 .06 57 37 ..5 7.5.1 1.51 ian has been developed. After design thun- <br /> ' 96 89 rec <br /> 'J'J .117 .UB _U 3n 75 7,86 1,57 derstorm precipitation values have been <br /> 95 87 98 .526 .11 55 35 74 8.18 1.114 P P <br /> 94 83 is .638 .13 54 34 73 8.52 1.70 arranged in respective time-sequence magni- <br /> 113 83 98 .870 .17 iA 33 2 8.87 1.77 tude (see table A-8), direct runoff increments <br /> 1I't el 97 .970 .I7 3^_ 71 U.2J 1.85 <br /> ' 91 80 97 .989 .201 ail 31 70 'J.61 1.92 are computed by the procedure in the examples, <br /> 'Jn 78 9n 1.11 .221 -In 31 70 10.0 2.Uf1 nsl❑ <br /> 89 7H 96 1.24 .2.51 49 30 C.9 10.4 2.09 section 58(C), g a ppropria:e runoff curve <br /> 88 7.5 95 1.30 .27 : 48 21 68 Us 2.16 number, table A-9, and minirflum 15-minute <br /> 87 73 95 1.411 30 47 28 67 11.3 226 retention loss rate for res ec:ive hydrologic <br /> 96 72 94 1.63 .33 411 27 HH LL7 2.34 p <br /> 85 70 94 1.7fi .35 45 16 1t5 12.2 2.44 soil group, table A-10. <br /> 94 n8 93 1.90 .38 44 64 12.7 2...4 <br /> U 67 93 2.05 .41 43 25 63 13.2 2.64 <br /> 82 66 02 2.20 .44 42 21 1i2 13.8 2.76 TABLE A-s.-Design, thunderstorm precipitation time- <br /> s[ rN 92 2.34 .47 41 23 61 14.4 2.88 sequence in 15-minute intervals <br /> 80 IQ 91 2.50 .JAI 40 2 rA 15.0 3.01) <br /> 79 n2 '91 2.66 3 In 21 .59 15.6 3.12 <br /> 1D 78 INI 9n 2.82 .5(1 1 38 21 58 16.3 3.2n Ordrr of nutaitude <br /> 77 59 89 2.99 .fU :I7 -0 17.0 :1.41) Time.Wo, <br /> u <br /> 70 58 89 3.10 n3 :IG I'J .511 17.8 3.513 <br /> 75 .55 I8.6 3.7^ %unn 1 and III %one II <br /> S7 88 3.33 .07 95 18 - <br /> 7J iHl 88 3.51 .70 34 I8 54 19.4 3.88 <br /> 3 54 1 871 3.70 .74 33 17 53 20.3 4.06 0.0.. . ...... ..... ... .... 0 0 <br /> .53 1 861 3.89 .78 32 IC. .51 21.2 4.24 0.25. ...... .. ... ..... .. 4 3 <br /> ' 71 5 4.28 .89 31 15 ail 23.3 4.66 .75 3 2 <br /> 70 .51 85 4.Y8 .Bn 30 15 50 ^_3.J l.fifi .7:1...... I <br /> On :a) 84 4.49 .90 1.00... .. 1 .4 <br /> Hs 48 94 4.70 .94 25 12 43 30.0 11.00 t.25...... .. .. ... 1 <br /> 67 47 83 4.92 .98 20 'J 37 40.0 8.00 1.50... ...... . . ... . ..... 6 <br /> 11H 415 82 5.15 1.03 15 11 30 .16.7 11.34 1.73............. ... . ... 7 <br /> 115 45 82 5..18 1.08 IU 4 22 '".a 18.00 2.I0 .. ... .... .. 8 <br /> 1" 44 81 5.112 1.12 5 2 13 190.0 38.00 2.25.... ..... .. .. 9 <br /> ;1- uu' JJ BO 5.87 1.17 0 0 0 in. m- 2.:A. .... ..... 10 <br /> 62 42 79 n.13 123 finitr finny 2.75.. ............... ....... 11 <br /> 17- 61 41 78 0.39 1.29 3.00.. .. ....... ............ 112 <br /> l� For CN in column 1. Duration limit of zone rainfall. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.