Laserfiche WebLink
<br />xv. Ground Water <br />LI <br />Water levels in the alluvial wells at the Edna Mine have remained <br />constant over the previous years with minor fluctuations occurring seasonally. <br />Elevations of the water in the alluvial wells and the spoils well are shown in <br />' Figure 9. As suggested in the baseline studies, the occurrence of a drawdown <br />in any of the wells is anticipated only during mining at the base of the slope <br />' near Trout Creek. <br />In reviewing the data, it is interesting to note that the spoils well has <br />also reached steady state. The equilibrium of WR-1 is further evidenced <br />through the surface expression of a spring on the lower portion of West Ridge <br />near the elevation of Trout Creek. <br />G ound Wa Opal; v <br />Comparisons of water quality data gathered from the alluvial wells at the Edna <br />Mine must be exercised with caution due to the differing stratigraphic units <br />intersected along Trout Creek adjacent to the various wells. The alluvium in <br />the vicinity of Well TR-1.5 intersects stratigraphy above the Wadge coal seam <br />while the alluvium in the vicinity of TR-3 intersects stratigraphy below the <br />Wadge seam. Alluvium in the vicinity of TR-4 intersects even lower <br />stratigraphic units than those at TR-3. The influence from contact with the <br />differing lithologies is not able to be quantified, therefore, differences <br />' between the wells may not be responses to mining related activities. <br />The general characteristics: temperature (Figure 9) and pH (Figure 10) <br />show the expected trends with temperature exhibiting typical seasonal <br />fluctuations and pH remaining constant over the monitoring period. <br />' Specific conductivity (Figure 10) values for the three alluvial wells <br />have remained fairly constant over the period of record and consistent with <br />values obtained during the baseline studies. As previously discussed, the <br />October 1990 and August-October 1991 specific conductivity values may be <br />suspect due to two separate malfunctions of the Horiba testing equipment. <br />Conductivity values during 1989, 1990 and 1991 for the spoils well WR-1 begin <br />with elevated levels caused by the leaching of various elements continuing <br />i <br /> <br />