My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP40562
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP40562
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:32:06 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:46:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/5/2001
Doc Name
2000 WILDLIFE MONITORING
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• were also observed. Additional animals recorded included: nine sharp-tailed grouse, three <br />coyotes (Canis latrans), three bobcats (Lynx nrfusJ, two golden eagles, and one bald eagle <br />(Hnliaeetus leucocephalus). <br />Elk occurred as lone individuals and in herds of as many as 137 animals; average herd <br />size was 17.9 animals. Elk were widely distributed over the area, but were notably absent <br />from the north-central and southeast edge of the area; elk were very sparse in the southwest <br />and extreme northwest corners of the area (Exhibit I). The predominant habitat types in those <br />portions of the survey area, except in the southwest, are agricultural fields and flat grasslands. <br />Three herds were observed on the Seneca II permit area, two herds were seen on Yoast, and no <br />elk were recorded on the Seneca 11-W permit area. <br />Ninety-eight percent of the elk seen (668) were in mountain brush habitat. A few elk <br />were also seen in sagebrush-grassland (7) and reclaimed grassland (4). <br />PRES has surveyed the expanded area seven times: in December 1994, each January <br />from 1995 through 1998, and in February 1999 and 2000. The very low density recorded <br />• during the December 1994 survey (Figure 1) was probably due to poor ground conditions <br />(patchy snow cover) and the use of a fixed-wing aircraft for the survey. Both of those factors <br />affected the observers' ability [o detect animals and resulted in under counting. Considerably <br />more elk were seen a month later, January 1995, when the area was surveyed from a <br />helicopter. Observed elk density in January 1996 was substantially greater than the densities <br />recorded during previous surveys. Snowfall from the onset of winter through January 1996 <br />was considerably greater than in other years. Excessive snow probably pushed more animals <br />out of the higher elevations of the Williams Fork Mountains and north into the survey area in <br />January 1996. Both snowpack and elk density were relatively low during surveys in 1997, <br />1999, and 2000. Although snow fall was also minimal during winter 1997-1998, the density of <br />elk in the area during January 1998 was the second highest ever observed. <br />Herds were widely distributed over the expanded area during each of the seven surveys. <br />However, herds have always been conspicuously absent from the agricultural fields and <br />grasslands in the northwest, north-central, and southeast parts of the area. Because there are <br />• no tall grasses or shrubs in those habitats, [he vegetation is typically covered by snow in <br />winter. Consequently, there is little readily available winter forage for big game in those <br />2000 Yoas~ Mine Wildlife Monitoring Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.