Laserfiche WebLink
Mountain Coal Company 1998 Annual Hydrology Report Wes( Elk Mine <br />Sedimentation Ponds <br />There are seven ponds, MB-1, MB-2R, MB-3, MB-4, MB-5, RPE pond, and SG-1, at the West <br />Elk Mine that are utilized to manage mine outflows, stormwater runoff, and wastewater <br />treatment effluent. In addition, there is a "freshwater" pond, FW-], that is used to equalize <br />diversions from the North Fork. Pond FW-1 serves as the raw water supply for the mine for both <br />domestic and in-mine purposes. In WY98, ponds MB-1 and MB-2R dischazged about 300 acre- <br />feet to the North Fork, whereas ponds MB-3 and MB-5 together discharged less than one acre- <br />foot. Pond MB-4 did not discharge during WY98. Pond SG-1, iocated in Sylvester Gulch, was <br />operational for the first time and discharged approximately 8 acre-feet during WY98. The pond <br />receives runoff from the ventilation shafts area and water encountered during development of the <br />mine ventilation shafts. The RPE pond, also in operation for the first time in WY98, did not <br />discharge during WY98. <br />Ponds MB-1 and MB-2R <br />As depicted in Figure 6, ponds MB-1 and MB-2R play a strategic role in water management at <br />the mine. Pond MB-1 receives mine dischazges and stormwater runoff, and can be dischazged to <br />either the North Fork or transferred to pond FW-l. Pond MB-2R receives mine discharges, <br />stormwater runoff and effluent from the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), and is released to <br />the North Fork or occasionally sent to pond FW-1. Both ponds operate in a "batch" mode; i.e. <br />water is detained while settling occurs then discharged to the North Fork. <br />Pond MB-1 was re-lined with a HDPE liner in January 1998 to eliminate a suspected source of <br />water to the mine site landslide. It was believed that the previous liner was damaged, thereby <br />• allowing water to seep out of the pond and to contribute inflow to the mine site landslide. The <br />new liner has been extremely effective in eliminating seepage from MB-1, which, in rum, has <br />aided in stabilizing the landslide. <br />Pond discharges to the North Fork are made in accordance with the MCC CDPS Discharge <br />Permit No. CO-0038776. Table 8 summarizes the water chemistry of ponds MB-1 and MB-2R <br />discharges during WY97. Table 9 provides the numeric discharge limits for the sedimentation <br />ponds, as per the CDPS permit. Neither pond had a discharge that exceeded numeric standards <br />during WY98. <br />Use of the NW Panels sealed sump and the Lone Pipe pipeline resulted in improved water <br />management in sedimentation ponds MB-1 and MB-2R. This fact is evident by the reduced <br />volume of water treated in the ponds and the lack of discharge exceedences. The water quality <br />of the North Fork is better protected during upset conditions due to the storage capacity of the <br />NW Panels sealed sump <br />Ponds MB-3 and MB-5 <br />During WY98, ponds MB-3 and MB-5 dischazged a total of less than one acre-foot to the North <br />Fork. These dischazges were made in accordance with the MCC CDPS permit. Pond MB-5 <br />received exclusively stormwater runoff and pond MB-3 received runoff as well as washdown <br />water from conveyors and the silos. All relevant numeric dischazge limits were met. <br /> <br />-031.500 Pagel Wrig 1 Warer Engineers <br />