Mountain Coa! Company 1998 Anuual Hydrology Report West 6(k Mine
<br />Baseline monitoring continued on eight springs initiated in WY96 (15-1, 15-2, E15-3, E10-2,
<br />• E10-3, E10-4, 26-1 and 27-1) as well as spring J-4, which was re-initiated in WY96. Baseline
<br />monitoring also began on springs E14-1, 24-3, and E10-1, which were added to the program in
<br />the Box Canyon permit revision (PR08).
<br />MCC, in cooperation with the U.S. Forest Service District Office in Paonia, Colorado, has agreed to
<br />informally monitor the U.S. Forest Service surface water resources, as depicted on Map 3, that aze
<br />located directly over panels to be mined, and within the angle-of--draw per the agreement letter in
<br />Exhibit 19C of the permit. These resources are listed in Table 3.
<br />Sampling Methods
<br />Monitoring included spring flow, field pazameters, and laboratory parameters. In sampling springs,
<br />a location was selected which approximated a channel as closely as possible. A step may have been
<br />cut into the channel base to facilitate positioning of a container. Flow measurements were made by
<br />the timed volumetric method: where a field technician times the filling of a container of known
<br />volume to determine the flow rate. Several measurements were taken and averaged prior to
<br />reporting. Field parameters of temperature, pH, and conductivity were made at the springs by
<br />collecting a sample from the flowing springs and measuring the sample for the pazameters using
<br />standard instruments that were calibrated in the field. Samples for analysis of laboratory pazameters
<br />per Table 2, Footnote 2 were collected by fi!]ing a clean, pre-fixed sample bottle from non-aerated
<br />spring flow. Caze was taken to minimize any increases in turbidity. Sample bottles were sealed,
<br />labeled, placed on ice, and transported to the laboratory for analysis.
<br />• Groundwater Monitoring
<br />There were thirty-two wells in the WY98 groundwater monitoring program and are summarized in
<br />Table 4 along with the formation each of the wells monitor. Wells GP-6 and GP-7 replaced wells
<br />GB-1 and GP-1, respectively, which were destroyed during construction of the lower refuse pile in
<br />WY97. Table 5 provides more detail on the completion of each of the wells in the monitoring
<br />program. Of the thirty-two monitored wells, eight were being monitored to establish or re-establish
<br />baseline conditions during WY97. Baseline monitoring continued for wells SOM-45-H-1, SOM-H-
<br />45-2, SOM-C-76, SOM-23-H-1, 96-2-2, 96-27-1, RAV-4b, and So.W-1 and So.W-3.
<br />In July 1998, the Division approved Technical Revision 85, which removed seven wells from the
<br />monitoring. Consequently, monitoring of wells GP-5, SOM-23-H-], SOM-23-H-2, LP-1, B-32,
<br />SOM-38-H-1, and JMB-12 ceased in July 1998.
<br />Field water quality samples were taken three times during the water yeaz at all stations if sufficient
<br />volume was present to fill the appropriate sample containers and if the well allowed access to the
<br />formation of completion. On an annual basis, all stations were similarly sampled and the samples
<br />were analyzed for a full suite of pazameters (Table 4), when conditions allowed.
<br />
<br />31-03 .5 Page rig t Water ngineers
<br />
|