Laserfiche WebLink
Mountain Coa! Company 1998 Anuual Hydrology Report West 6(k Mine <br />Baseline monitoring continued on eight springs initiated in WY96 (15-1, 15-2, E15-3, E10-2, <br />• E10-3, E10-4, 26-1 and 27-1) as well as spring J-4, which was re-initiated in WY96. Baseline <br />monitoring also began on springs E14-1, 24-3, and E10-1, which were added to the program in <br />the Box Canyon permit revision (PR08). <br />MCC, in cooperation with the U.S. Forest Service District Office in Paonia, Colorado, has agreed to <br />informally monitor the U.S. Forest Service surface water resources, as depicted on Map 3, that aze <br />located directly over panels to be mined, and within the angle-of--draw per the agreement letter in <br />Exhibit 19C of the permit. These resources are listed in Table 3. <br />Sampling Methods <br />Monitoring included spring flow, field pazameters, and laboratory parameters. In sampling springs, <br />a location was selected which approximated a channel as closely as possible. A step may have been <br />cut into the channel base to facilitate positioning of a container. Flow measurements were made by <br />the timed volumetric method: where a field technician times the filling of a container of known <br />volume to determine the flow rate. Several measurements were taken and averaged prior to <br />reporting. Field parameters of temperature, pH, and conductivity were made at the springs by <br />collecting a sample from the flowing springs and measuring the sample for the pazameters using <br />standard instruments that were calibrated in the field. Samples for analysis of laboratory pazameters <br />per Table 2, Footnote 2 were collected by fi!]ing a clean, pre-fixed sample bottle from non-aerated <br />spring flow. Caze was taken to minimize any increases in turbidity. Sample bottles were sealed, <br />labeled, placed on ice, and transported to the laboratory for analysis. <br />• Groundwater Monitoring <br />There were thirty-two wells in the WY98 groundwater monitoring program and are summarized in <br />Table 4 along with the formation each of the wells monitor. Wells GP-6 and GP-7 replaced wells <br />GB-1 and GP-1, respectively, which were destroyed during construction of the lower refuse pile in <br />WY97. Table 5 provides more detail on the completion of each of the wells in the monitoring <br />program. Of the thirty-two monitored wells, eight were being monitored to establish or re-establish <br />baseline conditions during WY97. Baseline monitoring continued for wells SOM-45-H-1, SOM-H- <br />45-2, SOM-C-76, SOM-23-H-1, 96-2-2, 96-27-1, RAV-4b, and So.W-1 and So.W-3. <br />In July 1998, the Division approved Technical Revision 85, which removed seven wells from the <br />monitoring. Consequently, monitoring of wells GP-5, SOM-23-H-], SOM-23-H-2, LP-1, B-32, <br />SOM-38-H-1, and JMB-12 ceased in July 1998. <br />Field water quality samples were taken three times during the water yeaz at all stations if sufficient <br />volume was present to fill the appropriate sample containers and if the well allowed access to the <br />formation of completion. On an annual basis, all stations were similarly sampled and the samples <br />were analyzed for a full suite of pazameters (Table 4), when conditions allowed. <br /> <br />31-03 .5 Page rig t Water ngineers <br />