My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP40291
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP40291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:29:17 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:41:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1998 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT
Annual Report Year
1998
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Moantain Coal Comparry 1998 Annual Hydrology Report <br />Hydrologic Monitoring Activities <br />• <br />Wesl Elk Mine <br />Surface Water Monitoring <br />In WY98, the surface water monitoring program remained essentially the same as during WY97. <br />The most significant change was that continuous dataloggers were installed at three stations (Middle <br />Dry Fork, Upper Deep Creek, and Lower Deep Creek), where only instantaneous measwements <br />were taken previously. No new surface water stations were added during WY98. The locations of <br />all surface water monitoring stations aze shown on Map 2. Field water quality samples were taken <br />three times during the water yeaz at all stations when sufficient flows were present. On an annual <br />basis, all stations were sampled and the samples were analyzed for a full suite of pazameters (Table <br />1). <br />Baseline monitoring continued at the six surface water stations added to the monitoring program <br />in WY96. These stations aze Horse Gulch; the East Gulch, East of Horse Gulch; the West Gulch, <br />East of Horse Gulch; Lower Deep Creek; Upper Deep Creek; and Upper Sylvester Gulch. <br />Sampling Methods <br />Surface water monitoring was conducted seasonally. Monitoring measwements included flow, field <br />parameters, and laboratory parameters as identified in Table 1. Surface water flow was measwed <br />through Pazshall flumes of varying sizes at the continuously recording stations identified in Table 1. <br />Continuous recording is done with Stevens Type F recorders and dataloggers. Temperatwe, pH, <br />• and conductivity were obtained at each surface water sampling station by selecting a grab sample <br />volume from surface water flow and measuring the sample for the pazameters using standazd <br />instruments that were calibrated in the field. Samples for analysis of laboratory parameters were <br />collected by filling a clean pre-fixed sample bottle from non-aerated flow. Sample bottles were <br />sealed, labeled, placed on ice, and transported to the laboratory for analysis. All equipment was <br />rinsed before and after sampling with distilled water, as well as sample water, prior to measwement <br />of sample parameters. <br />Seeps and Springs Monitoring <br />During WY98, forty springs were included in the West Elk Mine monitoring program (Map 2). <br />Table 2 lists the springs and groups the springs into fow broad categories: (1) springs above the <br />F-Seam in the North Fork drainage basin; (2) springs in or below the F-Seam in the North Fork <br />drainage basin; (3) springs and other water resources above the B-Seam in the Jumbo Mountain <br />area in the North Fork drainage basin; and (4) springs above the E-Seam in the Dry Fork <br />drainage. Field water quality samples were taken three times during the water yeaz at all stations <br />that were flowing. On an annual basis, all stations were sampled and the samples were analyzed for <br />a full suite of parameters (Table 2). <br />i <br />31- 31.50 age rig ( aver ngmeers <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.