My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP40111
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP40111
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:28:47 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:38:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/24/1996
Doc Name
1993 1994 & 1995 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORTS WEST ELK MINE PN C-80-007
From
DMG
To
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
Annual Report Year
1993
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- - - - - III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of NaNral Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 JII~~~ <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 I I <br />Phone: (70b 866-3567 <br />FAX: (703) 832-8106 <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCE <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />September 24, 1996 dames 5. tochhead <br />EKecmive Direao~ <br />Ms. Christine Johnston Michael B. Long <br />Mountain Coal Company Division Direc~or <br />P. O. Box 591 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />Re: 1993, 1994, and 1995 Annual Hydrology Reports; West Elk Mine; <br />Permit No. C-80-007 <br />Dear Ms. Johnston: <br />In reference to your letter received September 23, 1996 concerning <br />the Division's comments regarding the 1993/1994 and 1995 Annual <br />Hydrology Reports, please note that the Division's review responses <br />for these documents are not the same nor are they similar (as <br />stated by MCC in your recent letter). Thus, the Division requests <br />specific responses to each specific comment addressed by the <br />Division as previously stated in the two review letters (August 23, <br />1996 and September 6, 1996). Because of the similarity between the <br />AHR reports some repetition may exist within the Divisions <br />responses. if this is the case, please state this in your response <br />to any comment that you feel has been previously addressed and <br />refer the reader to the pertinent information. <br />Please note that the 1993 and 1994 responses were due on September <br />30, 1996 and the 1995 responses were due on October 7, 1996. The <br />request for extending the deadline for both review letter responses <br />is hereby accepted. The due date for responses to the Division's <br />1993/1994 and 1995 AHR reviews will now be October 7, 1996. <br />Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions please <br />contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />Michael P. Boulay <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />c: David Berry <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.