Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5. TDS levels in the t~lliams Fork River have exceeded the maximum predicted level. <br />Tables 29 through 32 included some data errors. The revised tables (Tables 29 <br />to 32) and Figure 24 indicate that the upstream and downstream dissolved solids levels <br />are within predicted limits as there is little increase in dissolved solids levels at the <br />downstream station. For 1994 the average dissolved solids for the downstream station <br />was only 36 mg/L higher than the upstream station and the maximum concentration <br />was only 26 mg/L higher. <br />6. SAR was not monitored in 1994. <br />SAR values were not included in the original submittal of the AHR. Historic SAR <br />values, including 1994, for all stations for which they are required to tre reported are <br />presented in Table 35. <br />7. Tables 29 and 31 show no values of maximum total recoverable iron. <br />The tables have been corrected to include these numbers. <br />S.a. Acidity and Chloride data were missing for the first quarter for station WF-1. <br />Figure 30 includes this data. <br />S.b. TDS data was missing for the third quarter for station 023. <br />Unfortunately, no TDS value for the third quarter for station 023 was found in <br />the review of our records. A table presenting conductivity values for this station is <br />included in lieu of this measurement. <br />B.c. January and first quarter data for 7 North Angte discharge were missing. <br />There was no discharge from this station in January 1994 (see Appendix 1). <br />Date for the remainder of the first quarter is included in the report (see Figures 17 and <br />18 and Table 22). <br />Please note the data listing includes both the 1994 and 1995 data. It is included in the <br />1994 response package in an attempt to cut down on reproducing it again for the 1995 <br />AHR, which will be submitted shortly. I am intending to reference this data listing in the <br />1995 AHR. Let me know if you would rather a separate data listing for the 1995 AHR. <br />Hopefully, we can both agree that it is not needed and will save some trees. Also, I <br />have included labels, with appropriate instructions, that can be placed on the maps <br />previously sent to the Division. Please place the labels on the appropriate maps. <br />Thanks for your help. <br />We are Sony for the delay in providing this data. In part this was due to problems <br />encountered in moving our water quality database from a mainframe to a PC. Most of <br />the problems have been corrected; however, some additional programming will be <br />required and will not be completed until mid-1996. <br />Sincerely, <br />Richard A. Mills <br />