Laserfiche WebLink
December 26, 1994 <br />M-94-115 (ORLON PIT) <br />Page 2 <br />must approve, a complete and adequate permit, such as M-94-115 <br />(ORLON PIT). <br />2. The Bolen Ditch will be protected by the 200 foot rule <br />(kee 1ng all operations at least 200 feet away from structures), <br />and by other means (such as placing the ditch in an open or <br />closed pipe). Furthermore, the natural drainage of the Bolen Ditch <br />will not be changed, nor will there be any "impound" of water, <br />since the drainage, from the ditch will be piped and/or diverted <br />around all gravel operations. Given the natural drainage in that <br />area and the porosity of the soil, it is very unlikely that any <br />impounding could even occur. <br />3. Mr. Keith lacks specific knowledge of possible adverse <br />effect(s) on his property, or Bolen Ditch, by proposed operations <br />of the ORiOfI PIT including any possible water impoundment. Mr. <br />Keith is not professionally qualified to offer any expert opinion <br />regarding any such possible effects. <br />4. Mr. Keith owns no interest in surface or minerals in ORLON <br />PIT, but is only an immediately adjacent surface owner within 200 <br />feet of the outer boundary of ORLON PIT operations. By his <br />protest, it would appear that Mr. Keith is attempting to stop <br />approval of ORLON PIT pending the outcome of his litigation in <br />Keith v. Kinney, Montezuma County District Court Case No. 94 CV 97 <br />(related to a separate geographic area from ORLON PIT). <br />Sincerely, <br />Charles G. Kinn y <br />CGK/rr <br />cc: Counsel <br />Client <br />Tom Gillis, DMG <br />00119 <br />