My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP39463
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP39463
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:26:04 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:24:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/29/2002
Doc Name
2001 Annual Reclamation Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• F~nandcd tiur~c~ Arcs <br />\II ~~ildlifr ohser~auons from the aerial survey arc listed in Appendix I. Big game <br />~b.~ n;uinns arc also illustrated on Exhibit I. :\ total of 66i elk (7.4 %mi') in 1 1? herds were <br />,rrn During the survey. Six hrrds of mule doer (i l animals) were also observed. Additional <br />animals recorded included tivo sharp-tailed grouse and three an•otrs I ('uncr !nn•un.~ 1. [ilk herds <br />ranged in size from I to ±2 animals, and averaged ~.9. F?Ik were wideh distributed throughout <br />the area. but were notably absent tom the north-central portion. fak were sparse in the <br />southwest, southe:ut, and extreme northwest corners of the area (Iixhibit I ). The predominant <br />habitat types in those portions of the sun•cy area, except in the southwest. arc agricultural lields <br />and flat grasslands. <br />Kinety-finer percent (G271 of the elk observed were in mountain brush habitat.:1 Iew elk <br />were also observed in trembling aspen stands (~"_') and sagebrush grasslands (1 G1. <br />'I'N'C has sun•cyed the expanded area eight times: December 1991, each January from <br />199 through 1998, and each I~cbruary From 1999 through 2001. 1 he very low density recorded <br />,luring the Uecemher 199.1 sunny 1~igure I) was probably due to poor ground conditions (patchy <br />• .now awerl and the use of a lixcd-wing aircrali tier the survey. Both of those factors utlccted the <br />+hscn•crs' ability to detect animals and resulted in under rnunting. Considcrtbly more elk were <br />observed a month later..);umary 199>, when the area was surveyed tiom a helicopter. Observed <br />elk density in lanunry 1906 was substantially higher than the Densities recorded during previous <br />surveys. Snow tall from the onset of winter through 1:uurary 1996 was considerahh• greater than <br />in other years. [excessive snow probably pushed more animals out of the higher elevations of the <br />11'illiams 1~ork .'vlountains and north into the sun•cy area in Junuan~ 1996. Both snowpack and <br />elk density were relatively low during surveys in 1997. 1999.2000. Although snow fall was also <br />minimal during winter 1997-1998. the densiq~ of elk in the area during January 1998 was the <br />serun.l highest ever observed. Despite the abundance of snow on the ground during the 2001 <br />survey, elk density in the expanded area w,v similar to that ubsenvd in the previous year. <br />I lords were w ideh• distributed over the cxpunded area during each o1• the eight surveys. <br />lawe~ er, hrrds were ahvay~ conspicuously absent from the agriculurnd fields and grasslands in <br />the n++rthwrst, north-central. ;m.l .++uthr:ut parts of the area. Brcuuse Ihrn arc no tall grasses or <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.