Laserfiche WebLink
"All-hit" ref. area cover standard for 2003 (Adj. Means weighted by °k of Affected Area) = 24.6°h. <br />90 percent of 2003 ref. area cover standard = 0.9 x 24.6 = 22.2% <br />• 'Percent "all-hit" cover (absolute) by herbaceous species as corrected for "allowable" annual and biennial <br />cover (i.e. no more than 10 percent relative cover allowed, See CDMG 1995, 1.IV.A.). <br />"Ratio of relative "first-hit" cover of herbaceous species to relative "all-hft" cover of herbaceous speces <br />° Seneca II-W extended reference area values from data collected in 2003 <br />° Seneca II-WS extended reference area values from data collected in 1997 <br />As can be seen in Figure 1, the allowable total "all hit" herbaceous cover observed in the 2001 <br />reclaimed areas sampled nearly equaled exceeded 90 percent of the standard set by the <br />reference areas. The 90% confidence limit well-exceeded 90 percent of the "allowable" cover <br />pertormance standard (Figure 1). <br />Inasmuch as the 2001 reclaimed areas at the Yoast Mine were only in their second season of <br />growth in 2003, the status of allowable cover nearly meeting the standard is encouraging. <br />Herbaceous Production <br />• Observed production values and derivation of the 2003 herbaceous production standard are <br />compiled /documented in the table below: <br />Yoast 2003 <br />Using the Seneca II-W <br />Phase III Herbaceous Production Standard <br />Vegetation Type Mean Herbaceous Production (Ib/ac) % of Aff. Area <br />Sagebrush/Snowberry° 1768.3 38.0 <br />Mountain Brush 1589.9 37.3 <br />Aspen Woodland° 2234.0 7.0 <br />Steep Mountain Brush 748 13.9 <br />Alkali Sage/West Whtgrs. 1,411 3.8 <br />YOAST 2001 Reclamation 2057.4 NA <br />Herbaceous production performance standard (weighted by percent of affected area) = 1586 Ib/ac. <br />90 percent of performance standard = 0.9 x 1579 = 1427 Ib/ac <br />° Seneca II-W extended reference area values from data collected in 2003 <br />• ° Seneca !I-WS extended reference area values from data collected in 1997; it is likely that values from <br />2003 would have somewhat lower, so the calculated standard is probably somewhat high. <br />