Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' ~S ~ <br />~~i <br />t <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Southwestern Portland Cement <br />Mining Impacts on Montgomery School <br />SHB AGRA Project E93-7038 <br />Page 6 <br />delay of 1600 pounds and a typical charge weight per delay of 400 pounds. The distance was <br />measured from the existing "C" pit at the Lyons Quatry to the property. <br />In summary, this analysis indicates the existing Lyons mining operation is potentially subjecting <br />the Montgomery School Building to peak ground velocities on the order of 0.18 in/sec. The <br />maximum explosive weight of 1600 pounds at the Dowe Flats site could result in peak ground <br />vibrations that exceed the 0.25 inlsec compliance level recommended for the Montgomery <br />School site during the first 10 years of mining. The typical blast using 400 pounds of explosive <br />per delay will result in maximum peak vibrations that are essentially at the.compliance limits for <br />the first two yeazs of mine development and decrease with time. Accordingly, controls will need <br />to be incorporated in blasting during initial mine development to achieve compliance with the <br />recommended ground vibration limits. The modified blasting operation as has been conducted <br />at the Lyons Quarry over the last 8 to 10 months demonstrates this control can be implemented <br />without excessively restricting mine production. After approximately 5 years, ground vibrations <br />at the Montgomery School will be at or below levels associated with the existing Lyons Quarry, <br />as mining at Dowe Flats moves from south to north. <br />A frequently raised concern in ground vibration analysis is the potential for several sources of <br />ground vibration such as highway traffic and blasting to cause an additive effect resulting in a <br />higher ground vibration than induced by any given source. This can potentially be an issue with <br />steady state vibration sources such as machines that induce vibrations that are at a near constant <br />frequency. With transient ground vibrations such as result from blasting, truck traffic or trains; <br />both the frequency and amplitude of the induced ground vibration are essentially continuously <br />changing. Further, the duration of the vibration is very short, ranging from hundredths of a <br />second with blasting vibrations to a few seconds with vehicle-induced vibration. As such, it is <br />improbable that two or more ground vibration wave sets would occur in such a manner as to <br />have an additive effect. This is demonstrated by the vibration monitoring performed of the truck <br />traffic into and out of the Lyons Cement Plant as reported May 24, 1993 (SFfB AGRA, 1993a). <br />Of the 19 monitoring tests, four included multiple vehicles passing the monitoring station. These <br />tests resulted in vibrations essentially identical to single vehicles, with no indication of <br />cumulative effects. <br />6.0 MONITORING AND CONSERVATION PROGRAM <br />For the life of the mining operation, a monitoring and conservation program is proposed to be <br />implemented. The objective of the program is to confirm that the compliance criteria is being <br />met and that the compliance level is providing for adequate protection of the Montgomery School <br />Building. <br />The program will start with apre-mine construction and pre-blast survey and structure <br />assessment of the school to establish a baseline condition record, providing the owner allows <br />access. During the baseline survey, an extensive photographic record of the building will be <br />made. Photo point datums will be permanently established (i.e. rebaz sunk in concrete in the <br />' L^ A G R A <br />Earth & Environments/Group <br />