Laserfiche WebLink
Kathy Welt and Christine Johnston <br />March 7, 1997 (DRAFT) <br />Page 5 <br />from the fault. Approximately 260 acre-feet was returned to the North Fork via MCC's treatment <br />system in MB-1 and MB-2R. The remaining water (40 acre-feet) has been pumped into the NW <br />Panel sealed sump starting in November 1996. Assuming that the rest of the mine had inflows <br />similaz to previous years (i.e., 12 gpm or 19 acre-feet per yeaz), the cumulative inflows to the mine <br />from groundwater in 1996 totaled approximately 320 acre-feet (averaged over the year this is <br />equivalent to about 200 gpm). <br />Lab analysis showed the fault water chemistry to be typical of other bedrock water obtained from <br />MCC's B-Seam monitoring wells (e.g., JMB-12). While some exploration and monitoring wells did <br />show high temperatures at depth (a possible indication of the higher than expected temperature of this <br />fault water), few of them indicated any inflows, let alone the flows which were encountered in the B <br />East Mains fault. <br />IV. NATURE OF NORTHWEST (NWl AND NORTHEAST (NE) PANEL SEALED <br />SUMPS <br />As a result of the unprecedented inflow of groundwater into the mine from the B East Mains fault, <br />MCC began using the volume created by the previous mining of 1NW through 7NW longwall panels <br />as temporary storage. As more information was obtained relative to the volume and characteristics of <br />this groundwater inflow, and given the essential need to avoid overloading the mine water treatment <br />system associated with ponds MB-1 and MB-2R, MCC decided to continue the use of this area as a <br />"large capacity sump." This report focuses on the NW and NE Panel sealed sumps. There are tour <br />small capacity sumps utilized during the mining operation throughout the mine that have a <br />cumulative capacity of less than ] 0 acre-feet. By contrast, the combined capacity of the NW and NE <br />Pane] sealed sumps, below the elevations of the seals, is over 800 acre-feet. <br />In both the NW and NE Panel sealed sumps, the floor elevations drop to the northeast, sitnilaz to the <br />dip of the coal seam. The resulting storage area, in plan view, matches the panel outline on the north <br />and east with a southwestern boundary perpendicular to the dip of the coal seam (i.e., from northwest <br />to southeast). The southwestem boundary is predicated by the elevation of the existing or proposed <br />seals, as shown on Figure 2. Because of the dip of the coal seam, the deepest portion of each sump is <br />potentially in the northeast comer; this elevation is 60 feet below the seals in the NW Panel sealed <br />sump and 120 feet below the seals in the NE Panel sealed sump. <br />The storage capacity in the NW Panel sealed sump at the lowest seal elevation is approximately 415 <br />acre-feet, assuming a collapsed material porosity of 20 percent in the longwall panel area and 100 <br />percent porosity of the development mining area. Using observed inflow rates from the B East Mains <br />fault in 1996, the estimated time to fill the NW Panel sealed sump at an average inflow rate of 235 <br />gpm (March to December 1996) is 1.1 years. <br />The NE Panel sealed sump will be utilized after the NE Panels have been fully mined, probably in <br />early 1998. The NE Panel sealed sump will have an estimated storage capacity of approximately 400 <br />acre-feet. Using similar assumptions (235 gpm) to those used for the NW Panel sealed sump, the <br />time to fill the NE Panel sealed sump area will be about l year. <br />Together, the NW and NE Panel sealed sumps have a storage capacity of more than 800 acre-feet <br />before the lowest seal elevations are reached. If the seal elevations aze reached, it will be necessary <br />