My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP38877
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP38877
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:22:59 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:12:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/12/1997
Doc Name
PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSQUENCES TECHNICAL REV SUMMARY
From
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS INC
To
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
Permit Index Doc Type
MINE INFLOW REPORTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kathy Welt and Christine Johnston <br />March 7, 1997 (DRAFT) <br />Page 15 <br />constituent concentration increases during 1996 were ____ percent for TSS, w percent for TDS, and <br />percent for total iron. These data demonstrate that MCC did not significantly affect water quality <br />in the North Fork during 1996, despite the extraordinary circumstances under which it was operating. <br />In addition to the NPDES exceedances described above, there were exceedances attributable to a rain- <br />on-snow event in February 1996 which was in excess of a I-in-25-yeaz event. <br />Summary of Surface Water Quality PHCs <br />To summarize, there are multiple potential surface water quality implications related to MCC's <br />utilization of the large capacity sealed panel sumps and inflows from the B East Mains fault. From <br />the standpoint of actual chemical or biological impacts to the North Fork, extensive data collected in <br />1996 indicate that there were no significant impacts. In addition, because streamflow increases were <br />small, there were no adverse physical impacts to the North Fork channel. <br />In 1997 and beyond, water quality impacts are projected to be even smaller than they were in 1996, <br />based on the analysis described herein and the conditions at the mine as ofmid-January 1997. <br />IX. GROUNDWATER QUANTITY PHCs <br />From the perspective of historical groundwater movement, the interception, conveyance and <br />discharge (to the North Fork) or storage of the fault water (in the sumps) seems unlikely to have <br />significant hydrologic consequences, in terms of groundwater quantity, because MCC knows of no <br />claim of reliance on these fault inflows. <br />Isotope ;malyses on samples obtained in November 1996 after a sustained period of constant 85t gpm <br />inflow were conducted for "finger-printing" and age-dating purposes. These analyses indicate this <br />water has been below the ground surface for an extended period of time. Tritium isotope analysis <br />shows there to be no tritium within the samples for all practical purposes. This indicates that the <br />water entered the subsurface prior to the detonation of nuclear explosives in the atmosphere (i.e., <br />before 1943). These analyses were conducted by Dr. Richard Hurst, an isotope geochemist, who <br />observed that, based on his years of experience, waters this depleted in tritium are usually greater than <br />1,000 years old. <br />Oxygen and hydrogen isotope ratio analyses were also conducted on B East Mains fault inflows from <br />November 1996 samples. The results show a deviation from the ratios expected for meteoric waters <br />in the Rocky Mountain region (i.e., the Meteoric Water Line). This deviation indicates a lack of <br />direct communication or direct recharge from a surface water source. Additional water quality <br />analyses are now being conducted and compared with known water sources in the general vicinity of <br />the mine to assess the potential source of the fault water and the potential impacts to the water <br />resources of the area. <br />Collection of this groundwater within the mine can either increase its downgradient movement time if <br />it is pumped out of the mine and discharged, or it can decrease its downgradient movement time by <br />storage in a sump where the water will eventually migrate down-gradient in or near the B-Seam coal. <br />Using the highest permeability values observed in the coal and overlying strata, the cumulative <br />outflow from these sumps (NW and NE Panel sealed sumps combined) is estimated to be less than <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.