My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP38715
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP38715
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:22:00 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 8:10:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/4/1981
Doc Name
GEOTECHNICAL AND DESIGN STUDIES MOUNT GUNNISON COAL MINE SOMERSET COLO FOR MERRICK AND CO
Permit Index Doc Type
STABILITY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> safety higher than 2.0 were obtained for a cut slope 2 (H) <br />' 1 (V); the cut slope has to be dewatered to the depth of <br /> 10 feet. The crest of the cut should be at a safe distance <br />' of at least 15 feet from the toe of the steep natural slope <br /> above the proposed entries. The underground drainage system <br /> installed to prevent the saturation of the entire cut height <br />' should be capable of dewatering a layer at least 10 feet <br /> thick; the cut slope should be dewatered for its entire <br />' height, i. e. between the cut toe and the crest. <br />' S. The same solution as recommended for entry 3 (elim- <br /> inating the retaining wall and replacing it by a cut slope) <br />' ~ ~ can be applied for entries 2 and 4; the. same criteria as <br /> recommended above should be applied for these portals. <br />' <br /> 6. The analyses were performed and recommendations made <br />' for cut configurations as indicated on Plates 2 - 6; if the <br />l d <br />h <br />t <br />fi <br />i <br />f <br />i <br />id <br />bl <br />diff <br />h <br /> na <br />ese cu <br />es <br />gn o <br />t <br />s cons <br />era <br />y <br />erent, t <br />s <br />e <br /> recommendations should be revised. <br />1 <br /> The dewatering recommended in this report can be achieved <br />' by various methods; two of them appear to be feasible for this <br /> purpose: horizontal (or slightly inclined) drains and/or <br />' vertical trenches filled with pervious material. <br />' Horizontal drains comprise an effective means of dewatering. <br /> They are horizontal or inclined holes drilled into the slope <br />' to be dewatered; slotted PVC casing is installed in the holes. <br />ll <br />Pl <br />h <br />h <br />f <br />h <br />13 <br /> own on <br />A met <br />drain insta <br />ation is s <br />ate <br />; t <br />e <br />od o <br /> system uses a specialized drilling rig named an Aardwark. A <br />' scheme of possible drain installation for the proposed mine <br /> ~ entries is shown on Plate 14. The drains are drilled in fans <br />' ~ from several locations; their length is such that they reach <br /> some 120 feet behind the retaining wall. The drains should be <br />1 <br /> <br /> on«roao mwwMO, nc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.