Laserfiche WebLink
\876i' <br />'ilia ~.~~no ~,,,,,,~ <br />c,,,~ ten, <br />UEPARilv1[Ni OF NATURAL R[SOURCF.S <br />n rd,nnr r.r.,,~ ~ C.,.coin., nn, ,. r, <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTO N, Director <br />M E M O R <br />12 August <br />T0: Susan Mowry ~ ~~ <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton ~ .~ ~-~-~_~ <br />RE: SundanceCoal Com any'~fTechnlcal <br />:'-" } <br />A N D U M ~-l~ <br />1983 <br />-`- <br />__~,_. <br />Revision Application; <br />oat cessing Waste Pile <br />Pursuant to your request, I have completed a review of a portion of <br />theSundanceCoalCompany's technical revision application for the Animas <br />Mine. I have specifically reviewed the company's request for an <br />amendment to their coal processing waste pile. <br />SundanceCoal Company obtained approval for construction of a <br />1,000,000 cubic yard coal processing waste pile within the permit area of <br />the Animas mine, as a portion of the permanent program permit. That <br />approval contained a stipulation requiring performance of waste material <br />`shear strength testing, in order to verify strength values assumed in the <br />geotechnical stability analysis contained in the original application. <br />The technical revision presents the results of that testing, completed by <br />F. M. Fox, Inc. and submitted to the Division for review under separate <br />submission. Utilizing these amended material shear strength values, the <br />applicant's engineer now proposes to redesign the coal processing waste <br />pile to maximize waste storaye capacity. <br />In completing the redesign and reanalysis of the coal processing <br />waste pile, the engineer utilized a silnplistlc Homographic stability <br />analysis technique developed by the U. S. Bureau of Mines for estimating <br />the factor of safety for tailings embankments and empoundlnents. During <br />the completion of the oriytnal pile's design analysis, the Division <br />considered this technique acceptable, because of the conservative <br />assumptions made concerning waste strength values and because of. the <br />relatively high safety factors projected. <br />Ilouever, the proposed redesign of the coal processiny waste pile <br />represents an increase in pile height from 145' to 320', and a volume <br />increase from 1 million to 3 million cubic yards. It is my opinion that <br />the proposed arnenl7id coal processiny waste pile should be the sub,Ject of <br />an appropriate sophisticated site-specific mathematical slope stability <br />analysts, prior to approval of the proposed technical revision. Tesarik <br />8 McWilliams, authors of Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations IJ8564 <br />(1981), relied upon by the applicant in analyzing the pile's stability, <br />state on paye 12 of their report; "The charts should be a useful tool in <br />initial embankment design or field work where detailed stability analysis <br />1s not imperative. However, the charts are not meant to replace the use <br />of slope stability models where time and resources are available." <br />'?O. <br />423 Centennial F3wlding. 133 Sherman Slreel Denver. Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />