My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP38083
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP38083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:17:38 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:58:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/3/1992
Doc Name
1991 REVEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Over the period of 1987 to 1991, the levels of production observed have varied as follows: <br />P <br />i <br />d <br />Ib <br /> ry <br />s per acre) <br />roduct <br />on (oven- <br /> AREA 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 <br /> <br /> ALL 1988.2 2257.2 1343.2 2303.2 2204.2 <br /> Wadge Pasture ----- 3049.5 2200.5 2740.7 2874.0 <br /> Sagebrush Ref. 1372.2 1211.6 508.8 1251.6 1231.6 <br /> Mountain Brush Ref. 651.3 1125.9 416.0 615.2 724.3 <br /> From the above data, it is apparent that after a low point in 1989, a recovery in production <br /> occurred in 1990 and continued or stabilized in 1991. Although 1990 was a drought year, the <br /> precipitation during the late spring and early summer was much improved over 1989 and may <br /> account for the recovery in production, as well as cover, in the 1990 reclaimed areas overall <br /> average. In 1991, the year's precipitation was much more favorable than the previous three <br /> years, however, the production levels observed were only slightly, ii at all, higher. This <br /> suggests that, although there was an immediate response in 1990 to a slight amelioration of <br /> drought, there is some other variable(s) acting in a limiting capacity, perhaps a root system <br /> reduced during the period of drought, or a reduction on soil microbiota population size or <br /> composition caused by the years of drought. <br />The abundant herbaceous production of the reclaimed areas provides a significant grazing <br />resource. Since, for the most part, woody species, especially old growth, offers little that <br />grazing animals find palatable, the reclaimed areas as they presently exist are probably more <br />closely compatible with the objectives of livestock growers, and may also be very compatible, <br />with the needs of wild ungulate grazers such as elk. The latter apparently find the production <br />of the reclaimed areas much to their liking as evidenced by accounts of mine personnel citing <br />the abundance of elk, especially during the winter, and the abundance, during summer <br />sampling, of their scat throughout many parts of the reclamation. Deer ere commonly present <br />in the reclamation as well. <br />The usefulness of reclaimed area production can be assessed by determining the proper <br />livestock stocking rates based on measured biomass production. The estimated stocking rates <br />for the reclaimed and reference areas in 1991 are as follows: <br />I~~I <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.