Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 2 <br />Item 6. The location of the Twentymile Sandstone well FBR2 is different on Map 13A (Figure 2 of the <br />AHR) and Map 23 B. 12/13/06 of the PAP. If the location is wrong on Figure 2, please correct it. If the <br />location is wrong on Map 23B, please advise for correction on a forthcoming technical revision. <br />Item 7. Please provide a copy (for insertion into the report) of Table 60 (missing) as referenced on page <br />12 of the report. <br />Item 8. Please provide information on Pond F in the report (page 12 and tables) <br />In addition, the following issues are identified: <br />Issue 9. Please add section lines and section designations to Figure 117 of the report. The purpose of <br />such information is to better correlate mining activity with groundwater monitoring reports. <br />Some of the questions (10 and 11) I have with regard to the second part of the review require changes to the <br />PAP. <br />Issue 10. A footnote to Table 1 on page EX 14-5 of Exhibit 14 indicates that there are to be two down-gradient of <br />mining activity monitoring wells in the Wadge Overburden. I have found only one, 008-77-58. Field parameters <br />(water level, temperature, pH, and EC) are to be monitored semi-annually and quality sampling annually (Table B, <br />page Ex 14-11, Exhibit 14). Monitoring data is in Tables 5 and 5a of the report. Historic and current water levels <br />are at Figure 8 of the report, and TDS at Figure 9. I don't see any impact from mining. If there is only one well, <br />Foidel needs to start monitoring another well to be in compliance with the PAP. Do you think we need the other? <br />Perhaps the monitoring program could be revised to use only one well. Maybe the requirement for the 2"d well <br />has been eliminated, and text to be revised was missed on this page. I didn't find any such documentation. <br />Issue 11. Points of Compliance information is still not described in Exhibit 14 (Bedrock and Alluvial <br />Grand Water Monitoring, page Exh 14-1) ofthe PAP. I believe it should be. <br />Issue 12. Previous reviews stated com liance with <br />A. Antidegradation CWCC regulations <br />Rule for Surface 3.1.9(2) and 3.3.0. <br />Water <br />The way I read the current rules, the antidegradation clause is no longer applicable. Your thoughts? <br />3/13/2007 <br />