Laserfiche WebLink
-_..,;.x,~.~... <br />~ ~ • <br />STEEPEN ROBERTSON AND KIRSTEN <br />Consulting Engineers and Scent~sts <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mike Young - BMRI <br />FROM ~~ave Hallman - SRK <br />DATE: October 27, 1993 <br />RE: DRAINAGE BLANKETlLINER COVER LAYER PERM~ABII,ITY <br />Additional laboratory permeability testing has been conducted on samples of the drainage <br />blankedliner cover layer material (Material Type 2) which was placed prior to utilization of the <br />screening plant currently on site. The samples consisted of the six-inch interval samples from <br />arrPC t t t to ~~ ,...+ ~, ~-..~,~._,, :- .~-, ^---.-.-.:_- ~._.. - -- - The interval samples <br />..- --.. _.. __.._.. -.....__ ~r.,... <br />from each acre were blended to result in a typical material representative of tlhe material placed <br />in each acre. <br />The samples were screened to remove all + 3: inch particles in order to create a gradation which <br />is suitable for the pet7tteability testing equipment in the lab. Gradations for the composite <br />samples (attached) indicate that the samples contain 19.6 - 26.7% finer than the No. 200 sieve. <br />The samples were prepared at densities of approximately I15-117 pcf rto simulate field <br />conditions. Recent density measurements in the Type 2 material indicates that this density is <br />higher th2.n tvpic~~!y r'chie:•ed during the construction and should result in pemneabilities which <br />are lower than those of the actual material on the liner. <br />The laboratory tests resulted in permeabilities of I.5 x 10'5 cm/sec to 4.9 x 10'5 cm/sec (see <br />attached). These values are approximately an order of magnitude higher than those obtained in <br />the field using the BAT equipment. This is attributed to several reasons; the BAT equipment <br />was developed for clayey soils and the material tested is a silty sand, and the BAT equipment <br />is only applicable for soils with permeability less than 1 x 10' cm/sec. Thee Type 2 material <br />exhibits permeabilities which approach or in some cases possibly exceeds the upper bound limit <br />of the equipment and the material is ouite drv which may be affective the resuUts. rnn~~rierat.t:• <br />more reuabttny is placed on the laboratory permeability measurements. Thei BAT equipment <br />is considered to be reliable for testing the clay liner material (material Type 3). <br />The laboratory permeability data indicates that the Type 2 material tested exhiCits a sufficiently <br />high permeability for the drainage layer to function as intended. <br />DH:Ip <br />Attachments <br />S.a'~a.. ~.ooe~..c~ arc -._ ~U S i..cc <br />X2,2 ~c_,-. ...ace Sue- . ~_a..-.:oce ~o~,~~aac 5227. U.S.A <br /> <br />