My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981-10-08_REPORT - M1977288
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1977288
>
1981-10-08_REPORT - M1977288
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2025 10:30:01 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:35:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977288
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/8/1981
Doc Name
THE SUNDAY MINE & DEREMO-SNYDER MINE ANNUAL REPORTS OUR FN 77-285 & 77-288 RESPECTIVELY
From
MLR
To
UNION CARBIDE CORP
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL FEE / REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III Ill lll'II'III'll • STATE OF COLORAOO RiC114nO0 IA1111 r m <br /> DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br /> D.Monte Pascoe,Executive Director <br /> rs MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br /> 423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br /> — Denver,Colorado 80203 Tel. (303)866-3567 <br /> David C. Shetlton <br /> Director <br /> October 8, 1981 <br /> Mr. Claude A. Thormalen <br /> Environmental Engineer <br /> Union Carbide Corporation <br /> Metals Division <br /> Uravan, Colorado 81436 <br /> RE: The Sunday Mine and Deremo-Snyder Mine - Annual Reports <br /> Our file nos. 77-285 and 77-288, respectively <br /> Dear Mr. Thormalen: <br /> Our Division has received and reviewed the annual reports for the above cap- <br /> tioned operations.. The annual fees of $275 .00 for each mine have also been <br /> received, and the receipts for these fees are enclosed. In general, I find <br /> these annual reports to be adequate under the terms of the Mined Land Reclama- <br /> tion Act. However, I do have one general question about the activity on each <br /> site. I will outline the situation as I see it. <br /> I note that the permit for the Sunday Nine is to have an affected acreage of <br /> 20 and the permit for the Deremo-Snyder Mine is to have an affected acreage <br /> of 60. To date the affected acreages for these two mines are 14. 7 and 51.5, <br /> respectively. Although neither mine has a total disturbed acreage that ex- <br /> ceeds the permit area, I am not sure from my examination of the original per- <br /> mits whether or not the areas affected by the radio tower (in the case of the <br /> Sunday Mine) and the new and/or planned vent holes (in the case of both mines) <br /> were mentioned as affected land in the original permit. That is, are these <br /> areas outside of the original permit boundaries? If this is the case, the <br /> new areas of disturbance should be added on as amendments to the pernits. <br /> Please contact me and clarify this situation at your earliest convenience. <br /> Thank you for your prompt attention to these annual reports. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Mark S. Loye <br /> Reclamation Specialist <br /> Enclosures <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.