My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP36093
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP36093
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:13:49 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:20:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
1987 MINE INFLOW STUDY
From
MLRD
To
CYPRUS EMPIRE ENERGY CORP
Permit Index Doc Type
MINE INFLOW REPORTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Govei <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Dlreetor <br />DATE: March 3, 1988 <br />T0: Greg Squire <br />FROh1: Jim Stevens ~~'S <br />RE: Eagle Mine (Permit No. C-81-044) 1987 Mine Inflow Study <br />I have reviewed the above referenced study. As a result of the sealing off of <br />even more of the mine during 1987 and changes in the drainage system within <br />the mine this study now covers relatively few of the significant specific <br />sources of the inflow to the mine. Only a total of 84 qpm of inflow was tied <br />by the study to specific sources or areas of the mine while an average <br />apparent mine inflow of 564 qpm was calculated for 1987 using the metering of <br />the mine water discharge. <br />Since there is so significant a lessening of the relationship between the <br />annual inflow study and the apparent actual inflow, I am agreeable to <br />approving Empires proposal to discontinue the study until, and only in the <br />event of, the apparent annual average inflow, as measured by the metering of <br />the mine water discharge, exceeds the operator's predictions by 70% or more. <br />I have discussed this with Larry Damrau together with which <.:eries of annual <br />inflow predictions should be used as a basis of the calculation and how the <br />accuracy of the metering could he confirmed. The metering wens found to be <br />faulty in the past so some provision cost he made to assure its future <br />dependability. <br />I am proposing that the estimates of mine inflow predicted by the Jacob-Lohman <br />method contained in Table 75, p. 2.06.6-11 of the permit application he used <br />as the basis of the calculations for "excessive inflow". Thtrse estimates <br />appear closer to the actual inflow experienced in the past and are the more <br />conservative of the two series of predictions made by the optrrator. I don't <br />think the mine should consider using the Jacob-Lohman predictions a hardship. <br />The inflow predicted for 1987 by this method is 28~ larger than that actually <br />experienced, i.e.780 v 564 qpm, which is a substantial ciu`shion. In order for <br />the 1987 inflow to have been "excessive" i.e.20~ greater than prediction, it <br />would have had to be 936 qpm or 66`s greater than that actually experienced. <br />In regard to establishing the accuracy of <br />meter should be tested annually by either <br />Division could accept. Even a record of <br />etc could provide a means of checking any <br />water. <br />the mine discharge metering, the <br />a firm or some method that the <br />the hours the pumps operated daily <br />variations in the metered volume of <br />/bca <br />5757E <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2:?73 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.