Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Govei <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Dlreetor <br />DATE: March 3, 1988 <br />T0: Greg Squire <br />FROh1: Jim Stevens ~~'S <br />RE: Eagle Mine (Permit No. C-81-044) 1987 Mine Inflow Study <br />I have reviewed the above referenced study. As a result of the sealing off of <br />even more of the mine during 1987 and changes in the drainage system within <br />the mine this study now covers relatively few of the significant specific <br />sources of the inflow to the mine. Only a total of 84 qpm of inflow was tied <br />by the study to specific sources or areas of the mine while an average <br />apparent mine inflow of 564 qpm was calculated for 1987 using the metering of <br />the mine water discharge. <br />Since there is so significant a lessening of the relationship between the <br />annual inflow study and the apparent actual inflow, I am agreeable to <br />approving Empires proposal to discontinue the study until, and only in the <br />event of, the apparent annual average inflow, as measured by the metering of <br />the mine water discharge, exceeds the operator's predictions by 70% or more. <br />I have discussed this with Larry Damrau together with which <.:eries of annual <br />inflow predictions should be used as a basis of the calculation and how the <br />accuracy of the metering could he confirmed. The metering wens found to be <br />faulty in the past so some provision cost he made to assure its future <br />dependability. <br />I am proposing that the estimates of mine inflow predicted by the Jacob-Lohman <br />method contained in Table 75, p. 2.06.6-11 of the permit application he used <br />as the basis of the calculations for "excessive inflow". Thtrse estimates <br />appear closer to the actual inflow experienced in the past and are the more <br />conservative of the two series of predictions made by the optrrator. I don't <br />think the mine should consider using the Jacob-Lohman predictions a hardship. <br />The inflow predicted for 1987 by this method is 28~ larger than that actually <br />experienced, i.e.780 v 564 qpm, which is a substantial ciu`shion. In order for <br />the 1987 inflow to have been "excessive" i.e.20~ greater than prediction, it <br />would have had to be 936 qpm or 66`s greater than that actually experienced. <br />In regard to establishing the accuracy of <br />meter should be tested annually by either <br />Division could accept. Even a record of <br />etc could provide a means of checking any <br />water. <br />the mine discharge metering, the <br />a firm or some method that the <br />the hours the pumps operated daily <br />variations in the metered volume of <br />/bca <br />5757E <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2:?73 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />