My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP35990
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP35990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:13:36 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:17:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/12/1999
Doc Name
BOWIE 2 MINE LAMBERT & ASSOCIATES ASSUMPTIONS PN C-96-083
From
DMG
To
JOE DUDASH
Permit Index Doc Type
STABILITY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiniii iii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St ,Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303)83?-8106 <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />DATE: July 12, 1999 <br />TO: Joe Dudash - <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />RE: Bowie N Mine - mbert & Associates Assumptions <br />mit No: C-96-083) <br />ern o~~en: <br />Governor <br />GregE Watcher <br />E~eculrve Director <br />Michael B. LOng <br />Drvismn DireUOr <br />)n response to your recent inquiry, I reexamined the Bowie No. 2 Gob Pile stability analysis <br />prepared by Norm W. Johnston, P.E., of Lambert & Associates. As I understand your query, you <br />desire to know specifically whether Lambert & Associates' stability analysis demonstrates that <br />the refuse pile at Bowie No. 2 has a safety factor of 1.5 in it's present configuration. <br />On page four of the report, the third paragraph states; <br />"Our stability analysis is based on the assumptions of an intimate and competent contact <br />between the GOB fill material and the natural support material which include the organic <br />topsoil removed and the exposed surface of the natural foundation support soil materials <br />benched prior [o placement of [he GOB material." <br />This statement appears unambiguous, as far as it goes. However, the report does not state <br />whether Lambert & Associates performed any examination or completed any inquiries which <br />determined whether the foundation had actually been benched prior to the placement of GOB <br />material. <br />The fourth paragraph on page four of the Lambert & Associates' report reads; <br />"The benching of the natural foundation support soil materials to expose competent <br />support material reduces the potential for developing a predetermined failure plane along <br />the GOB/natural material contact. We suggest that future plans include benching into the <br />natural material to receive the fill material prior to placing additional GOB material. The <br />benching should continue into competent foundation support material as the GOB <br />material is placed as the pile height is increased. The benching concept is shown on <br />Figure 7." <br />Figure 7 in the report is entitled "Toe Key, Bench Concept". The note included on figure 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.