Laserfiche WebLink
iVell SO'd 38 H-1 <br />:. • <br />Procedure: <br />Falling head and recovery slug tests were performed on this well on Sep- <br />tember 6, 1982 using a slug 4.4 feet long by 1.32 inches in diameter. Falling <br />head data is erratic and no interpretation is made. Data from the 42.5 minute <br />recovery test is somewhat better and is interpreted below. <br />Interpretation: <br />Recovery data from well SOD1 38 H-1 show very little response to the slug <br />for the first 3 minutes of the test. After this time the data points begin to <br />roughly follow the Cooper et, al. type curve. Even so, only five data points <br />from the test can be used to define the type curve. <br />From the five data points mentioned, transmissivity is calculated at T=49.5 <br />gpd/ft. by the Cooper et. al. method. Using the same final data points, T=24.4 <br />gpd/ft. is obtained by the line source method. The well is completed with gravel <br />• pack to the static water level resulting in an aquifer thickness of sandstone <br />and shale of the Barren Member of 115 £eet. Average formation permeability cal- <br />culated by dividing 49.5 gpd/ft. by 115 ft. is K=0.43 gpd/ft2. The depth of the <br />formation tested is between 465 and 580 feet. <br />• <br />so ESA Geotechnical Consultants <br />