My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP35899
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP35899
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:13:22 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:15:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1983 AHR, app. D, E. F, G (incl. slug testing)
Annual Report Year
1983
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The slug testing method and apparatus proved satisfactory for wells at the <br />h1t. Gunnison.~l D1ine with the unusual situation of deep wells (up to 982 feet <br />to water) completed in very low permeability materials. Other well testing <br />::• methods involving setting pumps in the wells or using air-lift to remove water <br />from the wells would be unpractical in most of the wells tested due to extreme <br />,lift heights, small well diameters, and the need for steady, very low flow pro- <br />i.. duct ion rates. <br />B. Analysis of Slug Test Data <br />Two methods were used to calculate transmissivity from the water level <br />versus time data collected for each well. These are the Cooper et, al. (1967) <br />type curve method and the Ferris and Knowles (1954) method. A third method <br />which was mentioned in ESA's proposal is the Bouwer and Rice (1976) method. <br />The Bouwer and Rice method relies on drawing a straight line through very early <br />test data and knowledge of well construction and borehole geometry. Since early <br />data at close time intervals is difficult to obtain without the use of pressure <br />transducers, and well geometry was unknown for some wells, this method was not <br />used to evaluate the slug tests conducted in this study, <br />• The Cooper et. al. method involves plotting H/Ho against log t on semi-loga- <br />rithmic paper and matching the test data to a type curve. With the arithmetic <br />(H/Ho) axes coincident, the data is matched to a best fit with the type curves <br />(Figure III-2; in back cover pocket) and the time value from the test data which <br />overlie the point at which T t/r~ = 1.0 is used to calculate transmissivity by <br />the following equation: <br />1,0 r- <br />T - c <br />t <br />where <br />H =head above static water level; <br />Ho = initial head increase in the well (either calculated or assumed <br />based upon observations); <br />t =time since instantaneous injection; <br />r =radius of well casing in which water level fluctuates; <br />c <br />• T =transmissivity of aquifer. <br />7 ESA Geotechnical Consultants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.