My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP35856
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP35856
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:13:16 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:14:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/19/1985
Doc Name
1984 AHR Review, Report & Water Monitoring Figures
From
MLRD
To
GREGG SQUIRE
Permit Index Doc Type
1984 AHR Report & MLRD Review
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-5- <br />Alluvium <br />In the Yampa River alluvium there are two monitoring wells, YAW-3 and YAW-5 <br />that are sampled quarterly for full suite parameters and monthly for field <br />parameters. In reference to Figure 21 conductivity levels have been extremely <br />high throughout 1984, (8000-12000 umhos/cm). In fact conductivity levels have <br />been high throughout the life of monitoring well YAW-5. These high levels may <br />be due to either improper or faulty well construction or they are natural <br />in-situ background conductivity levels. The water is chemically a NaSO4 type <br />water. Minor and trace elements are within acceptable limits. <br />Three monitoring wells completed in the Williams Fork alluvium, AVF-3, AVF-5, <br />and AYF-6 are sampled on a quarterly basis for full suite parameters and on a <br />monthly basis for field parameters. Except fora brief period from January, <br />1984 thru May, 1984 conductivity levels remained at an acceptable level. <br />During this time conductivity levels in Well AVF-5 averaged over 3,000 <br />umhos/cm. Throughout the remainder of the year conductivity levels were under <br />2000 umhos/cm. Chemically, the water is a NaHC03 type. Minor and trace <br />elements are within acceptable limits. <br />Springs <br />Empire Energy monitors four springs for water quality. North, Haxton and <br />Lippard No. 2 Springs are sampled quarterly for full suite parameters and <br />sampled monthly for field parameters. No. 1 Strip Pit is sampled bimonthly <br />for NPDES parameters and weekly for field parameters. <br />Summaries of 1984 full suite analysis and cumulative water quality analysis <br />are presented in Tables 31-35. These data indicate there are no water quality <br />problems in any of these springs. <br />Surface Water <br />Flow measurements are made at four surface water monitoring sites. Two sites <br />are on the Yampa River, YS-1 and YS-2, and are measured weekly. Two sites re <br />on the Williams Fork River WF-1 and WF-2. WF-1 is measured weekly and WF-2 is <br />measured on a continuous basis. Discharge hydrographs, Figures 23 and 25, for <br />the Williams Fork River indicates peak discharge occurs during May through <br />July. As predicted electrical conductivities decrease significantly during <br />this period of high flow. Water quality improves due to dilution from <br />snowmelt. Figure 26 shows a dramatic increase in suspended solids during high <br />flow. This is a normal predicted phenomenon. <br />No degradation to water quality in the Yampa and Williams Fork Rivers have <br />occurred as a result of Empire Energy's mining operation. In addition no <br />measurable impact to flows in the Yampa and Williams Fork Rivers have resulted <br />from Empire's mining activity. <br />r <br />.l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.