My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP35856
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP35856
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:13:16 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:14:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/19/1985
Doc Name
1984 AHR Review, Report & Water Monitoring Figures
From
MLRD
To
GREGG SQUIRE
Permit Index Doc Type
1984 AHR Report & MLRD Review
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sandstone aquifers is fairly constant over the whole period of <br />measurement. The tables include either all data collected through 1984 <br />plus an additional sample collected in March 1985. Also, carbonate data <br />is included when it is greater than zero (this applies for all the water <br />quality data). <br />COAL <br /> .Flows <br /> Plots of the measured discharges are presented on Figure 15 and figure 16. <br />' The flaws from the No. 5 and No. 9 Mines are measured at the discharge end <br /> of their respective settling ponds. The flow from the No. 5 Mine is also <br /> measured by a totalizing flow meters on the discharge ends of the mine <br /> dewatering pumps. The flow meter readings were used to prepare the N o. 5 <br /> Mine discharge figure while the pond discharge numbers for both mines are <br /> reported with the NPDES data as required by the NPDES permit. The <br /> measured discharge form the No. 9 Mine reflects the intermittent pum ping <br /> of the mine, and during the spring minor snow melt influx. None of the <br /> flow rates significantly exceeded the predicted values of 200 to 33G gpm <br />' for the No. 9 Mine and 760 to 890 for the No. 5 Mine. The 1984 ave <br />discharge from the No. 5 Mine was 737 gpm and'the average discharge rage <br />from <br /> the No. 9 Mine was 156 gpm. During the period from August 20, 19Eµ to <br /> September 27, 1984, there was no discharge from the No. 5 Mine because its <br />' new underground sump was fi 11 i na and the new mine dewatering system was <br /> being tested and installed. <br />' Water Quality <br />Summaries of the water quality data for the two mine discharges are <br />' presented on Table 13 to Table 16. The mine discharges are NPDES <br />discharge points. The data indicates that the water quality of the <br />discharges has been generally constant through time. The only parameter <br />which seems to be varying is zinc. The zinc values appear to exceed <br />standards occasionally. This may be a natural phenomenon because samples <br />from most of the aquifers and surface water sampling points also <br />occasionally exceed the standards. The NPDES effluent limitation for zinc <br />' has been changed and if the new standard were in effect for the entire <br />year, the standard would not have been exceeded. The NPDES limitation for <br />pH was exceeded infrequently at the No. 9 Mine discharge. The prob~em was <br />' remedied by upgrading the C02 treatment system. All noncomplying <br />discharges were reported to the appropriate agencies. <br />' ALLUVIUM <br />Sediments in two stream valleys are monitored: the Williams Fork River <br />Alluvium (3 wells) near the confluence v:ith the Yampa River and the Yampa <br />River Alluvium (5 wells) in the Big Bottom area. <br />- 3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.