My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP35727
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP35727
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:13:07 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:12:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/8/1987
Doc Name
1986 AHR: Text and Figures
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT 1986
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />' Coal <br />Flows <br />' Plots of the measured discharges for No. 5 Mine are presented in Figures <br />22 and 23. The flows from the No. 5 Mine are measured at the discharge <br />end of the settling ponds and also measured by a totalizing flow meter on <br />' the dewatering sump pumps. The flow meter readings for the No. 5 Mine <br />were only operational in November and December of 1986. The measured <br />discharge from the ponds reflects the intermittent pumping of the mine. <br />None of the flow rates significantly exceeded the predicted values of 760 <br />' to 890 gpm for the No. 5 Mine. The 1985 average discharge from the No. 5 <br />Mine was 860 gpm from the ponds and 600 gpm for the sump. The flow meter <br />readings are probably more representative. <br />' Water Quality <br />' Summaries of the water quality data for the mine discharge is presented in <br />Tables 19 and 2U. The mine discharge is NPDES discharge point No. 003. <br />The mine discharge has been generally constant through time. A plot of <br />' dissolved solids is presented in Figure 24. It indicates that the average <br />dissolved solids in the discharge water have increased from about 790 mg/1 <br />in 1982 and 1983 to approximately 890 mg/1 in 1986. This increase may be <br />' due to the longwall mining which was initiated in May 1985. This increase <br />in dissolved solids has leveled off in 1986. Since the dissolved solids <br />do not appear to be increasing further and they are not significantly <br />higher than previously estimated, the low flow mass balance prediction <br />' will not be significantly affected. No violations of the NPDES permit <br />were detected in 1986. <br />' ALLUVIUM <br />' Sediments in the Williams Fork River Alluvium (3 wells) are monitored. <br />All three wells are in the general area of the loadout facilities and <br />underground discharge sediment ponds. <br />' Water Levels <br />' Ground <br />normal water levels in the alluvium have <br />seasonal fluctuations apparently remained fairly regular, with <br />related to changes in river <br /> levels and an increase in 1984 due to increased runoff beginning the <br /> spring of that year. Ground water levels in the alluvium are plotted in <br />' Fiyure 25. A piezometric map for the Wi lliams Fork Alluvium (December <br /> 1986) is presented in Figure 26. <br />' Water Quality <br />' Summaries of the water quality data for the alluvial wells are presented <br />in Tables 21 through 26. N plot of field electrical conductivity versus <br />time is presented in Figure 21. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.