Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l0. in future reports refer to springs as shown on the map rather <br />than by the use of the cryptic seven digit in-house codes. <br />11. No common names were provided for 5868901, 6862014, <br />5863030,5903001, OVBITD, Area 41. <br />12. Mine 1 seep comp near TS pile, FCBH near fan, P-2, Area 31-AA, <br />Mine 2 PG 6-1 above stockpond, FCBH seep below bench. These <br />springs are not spotted on the Map (Figure 3). <br />13. No data was submitted for the following springs; 60-1, 60-2, <br />60-3, U, V, M2PS2, M2PS1, MIC, 31-1. <br />14. Table 38 is a repeat of Table 37. Table 40 is a repeat of <br />Table 39. <br />15. Table 51 appears to be spring E. <br />16. What is site 80 on Table 30? <br />17. Table 30, Summary of Flow Rate Data is again this year, as in <br />1992, not representative of the data. Please correct all <br />columns on this table to represent exactly what each column <br />indicates and ensure that this matches exactly with the data <br />submitted. <br />18. What does the column flow 1993 represent on Table 30? <br />19. Figure 31 says the May 23 reading for site 16 is an estimate <br />and it reads 50 cfs. No value is shown in the Site 16 data for <br />that date. However, the level reading for April 29 is -1.82 <br />and the discharge is 58.73 cfs. The level for May 23 is - <br />3.12. Why is an approximate discharge not recorded and why <br />does the graph have a value of 50 cfs for May 23? <br />20. Why were Wadge wells 027-79-4 and 026-79-6 sampled in June <br />rather than April or May as required by the approved <br />monitoring plan? <br />21. Why were all spoil wells sampled in June rather than April or <br />May? <br />Monitoring Frequency <br />Please submit the data for each of the following noted omissions: <br />Bedrock Wells ~q,~~b~-b <br />* Bicarbonate, sulfate for 001-5-5, 006-82-74C /'~ <br />O~* June depths for 026-79-4 and 026-79-6 <br />* Water elevation for 006-82-74C <br />~~~ ~ <br />R~ <br />