My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-10-03_REPORT - C1980005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
1990-10-03_REPORT - C1980005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2021 2:45:13 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:03:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/3/1990
Doc Name
REVEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
Annual Report Year
1989
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> • 11 species. Since the reclaimed areas studied vary from year to year and are in all cases quite <br /> large, any increase in species encountered such as reported here may be a product of chance. <br /> Effects_ of Grazing in the Wadge Pasture Unit <br /> Since there are now two years of data since grazing began in the Wadge Pasture (Area D), it is <br /> possible to make some preliminary observations on the effects of grazing on the ecology of this <br /> area compared to other areas of older Wadge reclamation. As mentioned above, there has been a <br /> decline in cover and production over the entire study area including reference areas during the <br /> period of 1987 to1989. Cover has dropped in the 1978 Wadge (Area B this year) by 46.8% <br /> and by 27.8% in the 1980/82 Wadge (Area C this year) just between 1988 and 1989. By <br /> comparison, the Wadge Pasture area (Area D this year) has decreased only 10.7%. Likewise, <br /> production in the 1978, 80,82 Wadge areas has decreased beween 1988 and 1989 by about 51 <br /> %, whereas the decrease in the Wadge Pasture has been only 29.4%. <br /> As of 1989, cover and production levels in the Wadge Pasture was higher than in any other <br /> • reclaimed area at the Seneca 11 Mine. This suggests that the lingering and/or delayed effects of <br /> the dry periods of the 1987/1988 period have been muted or counteracted in the grazed area. <br /> The specific reasons behind this effect may include, first the release of nutrients bound in <br /> accumulated litter,or more specifically, the cycling of nutrients present in live biomass that <br /> would have ended up in the litter reservoir. As biomass was consumed by cattle and the <br /> processed remains were left on the ground as feces, the nutrients return to the plant-available <br /> form much more rapidly than they would by becoming dead standing biomass, eventually <br /> becoming fallen dead (litter,) and eventually entering the soil as small pieces of litter. The <br /> cattle may also be important in physically breaking the litter into pieces small enough to enter <br /> the soil or to be available to the larger detritivors such as beetles or sow bugs. The effects of <br /> grazing on nitrogen availability have recently been addressed by Dormaar et al. (1990), who <br /> found that available NH4+- N and NO3-- N increased with increased grazing intensity. These <br /> authors speculated that the increase in grazed systems was partly related to increased <br /> concentration of N in excreta, or it may be related to increased denitrification under the more <br /> shaded, cool, and moist conditions of ungrazed areas in which standing dead biomass retards solar <br /> warming of the soil well into the growing season (Bauer et al. 1987. as cited in Dormaar et al. <br /> • 1990). <br /> 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.