My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-10-03_REPORT - C1980005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
1990-10-03_REPORT - C1980005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2021 2:45:13 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 7:03:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/3/1990
Doc Name
REVEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
Annual Report Year
1989
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Species Density and Species Composition <br /> Tables 1 through 10 show species density data from each cover sample; these data are <br /> summarized in Table 30 and are graphically depicted in Figure 4. <br /> Species composition, as reflected in cover data, is present in Tables 1 through 10. Table 31 <br /> summarizes the relative cover data from these tables by lifeform and provenance. Figure 5 <br /> graphically depicts the same data. <br /> Species and lifeform density data reflect both total species/lifeform richness and equitability. <br /> The latter is incorporated by virtue of the fact that the occurrence of species is tallied within <br /> fixed unit areas (100 m2), and thus frequency is addressed simultaneously with species <br /> richness. The highest total species density of all areas was observed in the young reclaimed <br /> areas (Areas E, F, G, and H), where annual and biennial weedy plants are abundant ine early <br /> stages of secondary succession. Highest native species density was in Mountain Brush and <br /> Sagebrush References Areas (19.9 and 22.2 native species per 100 m2), but the 1985/1986 <br /> Wolf Creek and Wadge reclamation areas (Areas E and G) were fairly close behind at 17.3 and <br /> • 15.5 native species per 100 m2. The 1987 Wolf Creek and Wadge areas (Areas F and H) were <br /> also fairly high at 12.2 and 12.5 native species per 100 m2, respectively. The 1980/1982 <br /> Wadge and Wadge Pasture areas (Areas C and D) were moderate in native species density at 8.2 <br /> and 9.6 native species per 100 m2, respectively. Lowest native species density (and total <br /> species density) were the pre-law and 1977 Wadge areas (Areas A and B) with only 1.0 and 4.0 <br /> native species per 100 m2, respectively. <br /> Annual and biennial (orbs were, not unexpectedly, most diverse in the young reclamation area <br /> (Area E, F, G, and H); this was true for both introduced and native annuals and biennials. <br /> Introduced perennial forb species were rather uniformly present at about 1.5 to 3 species per <br /> 100 m2, except in the youngest (1987) Wadge area (Area H) and the reference areas where <br /> they were less than one species per 100 m2. Native perennial forbs are almost nil in the <br /> pre-law areas (Area A) and progressively more abundant in the 1977 Wadge and 1980/1982 <br /> Wadge areas (Areas B and C) at 1.3 and 2.4 species per 100 m2, respectively. Wadge Pasture <br /> was observed to have 3.7 native perennial forb species per 100 m2. A substantial increase in <br /> native perennial forb presence was seen in the younger reclamation where native perennial forb <br /> • species ranged from 6.1 species per 100 m2 (1987 Wolf Creek, Area F) to 8.6 species per 100 <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.