REP34915 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' Discussion ' The Hydrometeorology Reports (HMRs) which apply to the Williams Fork drainage basin and adjacent regions to the east were reviewed and used as a baseline. HMR 49 and HMIs SSA were ' reviewed extensively with the storm data base and standazdized procedures given particular attention. When HMR 49 was developed, guidance was drawn from HMR.s for adjacent or t neighboring regions. To the east of the Continental Divide, HMR 51 provided the cl~~sest reference. A comparison shows large PMP differences from west to east, with much greater PMP values east of the Divide at comparable latitudes. The issue of how to treat the resultant PMP ' gradient across the Continental Divide proved to be difficult to address. The result Haas that relatively high PMP values were shown west of the Divide in HMR 49 over the immediate ' western slope, including the location of the Williams Fork drainage. t It is important to note that in HMR 49, this circumstance is acknowledged and addressed directly. Referring to HMR 49 Figure 1.1 (Figure 1 in this report), the following statement is I~resented in the HMR 49 text: t "The shaded portion of Figure 1.1 is a zone to the west of the Continental Divide. where the PMP values are considered least certain. Detailed generalized PMP ' estimates including seasonal variations are not available for the slopes immediately east of the Continental Divide. PM1' gradients in this region can influence PMP estimates west of the Divide. A future PMP study covering the area east of the Divide is needed before there will be comparable confidence in PMP over the contiguous portion of the Southwestern States." ' HMRs 55 and SSA have provided the needed studies east of the Continental Divide. However, the issue of PMP gradients west of the Divide still needs to be addressed with detailed studies ' such as the site-specific Williams Fork PMP study. The location of the Henderson Mill drainage on the northeast slope of the Williams Fork Range is ' very significant. This location is in the immediate rainshadow of the Williams Fork Range and therefore storms which occur over the basin have the Williams Fork Range as an immediate ' upwind moisture barrier. This barrier is the second significant moisture bamer under southwesterly boundary layer wind conditions (the inflow wind direction for the lazg~:st of the ' general storms) in the central Rockies. The Gore Range provides a slightly higher baurier further to the southwest. A picture of the Gore Mountains is shown in Figure 3. This view to the southwest from Ute Pass at the top of the Henderson IVfill drainage basin shows how significant this range is as a barrier to low level atmospheric moisture approaching the Williams Fork basin from the southwest. ' Page 4