My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP34514
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP34514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:11:27 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/18/1996
Doc Name
1994 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT PN C-81-071
Annual Report Year
1994
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Permit C-81-071 1994 Annual Hydrology Report <br />• runoff and spoil spring flows. All of the plots show the typical seasonal variation with high flows <br />during spring runoff. Historically, discharges from the ponds ceased in the summer and did not <br />begin again until the next spring. Three ponds, A (Site 39), D (Site 84) and F (Site 87), began <br />discharging year round in late 1984. This is due to the spoil springs located in the drainages of <br />Ponds A and F and the past underground mine discharge to Pond D. Due to low runoff and <br />utilization of Site 114 and Site 87 for emergency water supplies by Twentymile Coal Company, <br />Sites 30 and 87 experienced periods of no discharge during 1994. <br />Pond A now has a base flow of approximately 0.7 cfs, Pond D 0.3 cfs and Pond F 0.1 cfs. <br />Pond F did not discharge significant amounts in the 1994 irrigation season, and showed a <br />decreased flow since 1991, due to periodic pumping of the pond and Spring 114 for mine use. <br />The discharge from Pond D decreased in 199 due to cessation of discharge from the <br />underground mine to Pond D. Flows from these ponds have changed Foidel Creek from an <br />ephemeral to a perennial stream. Peak discharges from the ponds do not seem to have <br />changed significantly because the spoil spring water would probably have discharged as <br />snowmelt runoff anyway. <br />Water Quality <br />Summaries of the water quality data for the Mine 1 ponds are presented on Tables 53 through <br />62 and on Figures 45 and 50 through 54. The field conductivity data shows some typical <br />seasonal variation: the water quality improves during spring runoff. Ponds A, D, F, and H <br />appear to be impacted by spoil spring inflows. The discharge rates from H are not significant <br />• during irrigation season and therefore do not cause any significant impacts <br />For the ponds affected by spoil springs, increased calcium, magnesium, sulfate, dissolved <br />solids, and SAR were observed. No significant changes in parameters were observed for the <br />ponds during the 1994. The observed Trout Creek conductivity increase between sites during <br />1994 was not enough to cause material damage, and occurred during a period of irrigation <br />withdrawals. Also, the water quality of Trout Creek was better than maximum levels predicted <br />in the past salt-loading calculations performed as part of the "probably hydrologic impacts" <br />section of the mine permit application. The only insignificant discharges at Mine 2 were <br />recorded during spring runoff. Therefore no impacts to Fish Creek were observed as a result of <br />runoff from Mine No. 2 in 1994. <br />IMPACTS AND FUTURE MONITORING <br />Increased salt loading from the Mine No. 1 discharges have been observed since 1982. They <br />appear to have leveled off starting in 1986. The increased salt loading was predicted as <br />described in the "probable hydrologic consequences" section of the permit renewal application. <br />Actual observed salt loading in Trout Creek during the irrigation season resulting from surtace <br />mining operations is less than predicted and has not caused material damage. The total <br />recoverable manganese levels in Foidel Creek are below the stream standard. <br />• Localized increases in dissolved solids in the Foidel Creek alluvium have been observed; <br />however, these increases are confined to areas immediately adjacent to the mine and no <br />EP4TE%T.DOC 03717/97 Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.